It's Coming

#178
#178
AshG said:
Hey now, do better. Being crass erodes your effectiveness.
Click to expand...
Do you have any idea how hard it is to keep explaining things over and over again and then have some dolt repeatedly argue there is no such thing as separation of church and state contained in the Constitution?
 
#181
#181
RobertPellitt said:
Do you have any idea how hard it is to keep explaining things over and over again and then have some dolt repeatedly argue there is no such thing as separation of church and state contained in the Constitution?
Click to expand...

Yep.

Sometimes you just have to cut bait and row on. @hog88 is good people but if he disagrees with you the first time he's not changing his mind for the 101st explanation. You have a better chance at convincing some of our other posters that Telegram isn't a quality news source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RobertPellitt
#182
#182
RobertPellitt said:
Do you have any idea how hard it is to keep explaining things over and over again and then have some dolt repeatedly argue there is no such thing as separation of church and state contained in the Constitution?
Click to expand...

He knows because he deals with us dolts on this board almost every day. Now point to the words in the 1A separating church and state.
 
#185
#185
AshG said:
Yep.

Sometimes you just have to cut bait and row on. @hog88 is good people but if he disagrees with you the first time he's not changing his mind for the 101st explanation. You have a better chance at convincing some of our other posters that Telegram isn't a quality news source.
Click to expand...

He has yet to show me where in the 1A it separates church and state. Since you are much smarter maybe you can.
 
#186
#186
AshG said:
Yep.

Sometimes you just have to cut bait and row on. @hog88 is good people but if he disagrees with you the first time he's not changing his mind for the 101st explanation. You have a better chance at convincing some of our other posters that Telegram isn't a quality news source.
Click to expand...
That isn’t what’s happening though. You’ve watched this enough. Hogg even gave him the setup, he quoted the whole amendment. All that’s missing is pointing to the appropriate clause and expanding/explaining but… 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: AshG and hog88
#187
#187
RobertPellitt said:
It’s there …. You just keep reading it. Don’t stop just keep studying it.
Click to expand...
I’m going to do you a favor. Hogg is attacking the sloppy over used “separation of church and state” phrase. There isn’t an actual separation in practice. Congress opens sessions with a prayer. You see religious phrases in many of our documents and declarations. Our elected officials choose to generally use a Bible to swear their oath of office on.

The bill of rights is a list of SHALL NOTS imposed on the federal government. What is called out in 1a isn’t a “separation” of church and state, rather the state cannot use religion as a basis of persecution of individuals or groups. That’s it. But we see religion and religious references all over our government
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88, AshG and tntar heel
#188
#188
NorthDallas40 said:
I’m going to do you a favor. Hogg is attacking the sloppy over used “separation of church and state” phrase. There isn’t an actual separation in practice. Congress opens sessions with a prayer. You see religious phrases in many of our documents and declarations. Our elected officials choose to generally use a Bible to swear their oath of office on.

The bill of rights is a list of SHALL NOTS imposed on the federal government. What is called out in 1a isn’t a “separation” of church and state, rather the state cannot use religion as a basis of persecution of individuals or groups. That’s it. But we see religion and religious references all over our government
Click to expand...
That is not what separation of church and state provides. If you read the 1st Amendment there is an “establishment clause” and a “free exercise clause” and any reasonable American, except this fool, knows that is the make up of the separation of church and state. Arguing otherwise is just, well ….. ignorant.
 
Last edited:
#189
#189
RobertPellitt said:
That is not what the separation of church and state. If you read the 1st Amendment there is an “establishment clause” and a “free exercise clause” e dry reasonable American, except this fool, knows that is the make up of the separation of church and state. Arguing otherwise is just, well ….. ignorant.
Click to expand...
Oh well I tried.

C8243399-20E7-4128-89E0-E054DC49BABC.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#191
#191
RobertPellitt said:
I guess if being right is digging a hole I’ll see you in China. Nighty night sweet pea.
Click to expand...
I know exactly whom is right. You’re a parrot here without really explaining. 1a prevents us from becoming a theocracy and using theocratic legislation to persecute our citizens. But we see religion and religious context everywhere in our government and elected officials. If anything you are just another example parroting an over used phase you haven’t ever questioned or dissected. Good night honey! 😘

Edit: or as ashg pointed out theocracy OR theonomy.
 
Last edited:
#192
#192
NorthDallas40 said:
I know exactly whom is right. You’re a parrot here without really explaining. 1a prevents us from becoming a theocracy and using theocratic legislation. But we see religion and religious context everywhere in our government and elected officials. If anything you are just another example parroting an over used phase you haven’t ever questioned or dissected. Good night honey! 😘
Click to expand...
Well if you don’t believe the Constitution separates church and state then you are a lunatic that nobody should give much attention. Nobody realistically believes such nonsense.
 
#193
#193
RobertPellitt said:
Well if you don’t believe the Constitution separates church and state then you are a lunatic that nobody should give much attention. Nobody realistically believes such nonsense.
Click to expand...
I told you the mechanism. You just replied with the same parroting. Go sleep it off
 
#194
#194
NorthDallas40 said:
I told you the mechanism. You just replied with the same parroting. Go sleep it off
Click to expand...
You do understand no legal scholar or even a a layperson with a brain stem actually believes anything that you are arguing or support? You keep being a bona fide radical on that deserted island that you govern all by yourself. Just keep telling yourself you’re right. Keep doing it even though everyone is laughing at you.
 
#195
#195
RobertPellitt said:
You do understand no legal scholar or even a a layperson with a brain stem actually believes anything that you are arguing or support? You keep being a boba dude radical on that deserted island that you govern all by yourself. Just keep telling yourself you’re right. Keep doing even though everyone is laughing at you.
Click to expand...
Actually yes they all believe exactly what I’m saying. You are not able to comprehend what I am saying however as you are too hung up on a phrase without understanding meaning or mechanism of the phrase. I thought you were going to bed.
 
#196
#196
NorthDallas40 said:
Actually yes they all believe exactly what I’m saying. You are not able to comprehend what I am saying however as you are too hung up on a phrase without understanding meaning or mechanism of the phrase. I thought you were going to bed.
Click to expand...
You do understand the discussion was that a poster did not believe the separation of church and state was in the Constitution. That is wrong. It is in there. The Supreme Court held as such. Game over, good night. That was the discussion you entered. No other explanation is needed. Count those sheep sweet pea.
 
#197
#197
RobertPellitt said:
You do understand the discussion was that a poster did not believe the separation of church and state was in the Constitution. That is wrong. It is in there. The Supreme Court held as such. Game over, good night. That was the discussion you entered. No other explanation is needed. Count those sheep sweet pea.
Click to expand...
No that isn’t what he was doing. I already told you that. He was CHALLENGING you to back up your assertion. And you failed miserably. And it was painful to watch so I tried to explain to you what was happening. But you won’t shut up and read and comprehend 🤷‍♂️
 
#198
#198
NorthDallas40 said:
No that isn’t what he was doing. I already told you that. He was CHALLENGING you to back up your assertion. And you failed miserably. And it was painful to watch so I tried to explain to you what was happening. But you won’t shut up and read and comprehend 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
I understand completely I was part of that dialogue. I will continue to write it here. Because you can’t see the forest because of the trees. There is a separation of church and state in the Constitution. To argue otherwise is asinine. If you admit that and then want to engage how that is established, then fine. But until then it’s silly to debate anything with you. Because the courts, Congress and the Executive Branch regardless of political affiliation disagrees with you.
 
#199
#199
RobertPellitt said:
I understand completely I was part of that dialogue. I will continue to write it here. Because you can’t see the forest because of the trees. There is a separation of church and state in the Constitution. To argue otherwise is asinine. If you admit that and then want to engage how that is established, then fine. But until then it’s silly to debate anything with you. Because the courts, Congress and the Executive Branch regardless of political affiliation disagrees with you.
Click to expand...
Go find a mirror champ. Hogg planted a whole damn forest around you while you just railed continually at a single tree. Sweet dreams
 
  • Like
Reactions: tnvols72
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top