Why do people assume that Petrino, who has been described as an excellent coach that "lies like it's his second language", will be honest and faithful this time despite his past history to the contrary? Don't ask the win-at-all-costs fans, but ask the university administrators at Arky or Louisville whether they would hire him again. For the record, I'd bet that SOMEONE will weaken and hire him again. May God have mercy on their souls.
Petrino is a snake. Arkansas is in shambles. He left ATL in shambles. He left Louisville in shambles. Pass. Zero integrity and cares zero about defense.
But...they have an opening and he's not being considered. Thus, I am at least 99% sure that you are wrong. (1% withheld because stranger things have happened!)
What does that have to do with winning football games?
Why do people assume that Petrino, who has been described as an excellent coach that "lies like it's his second language", will be honest and faithful this time despite his past history to the contrary? Don't ask the win-at-all-costs fans, but ask the university administrators at Arky or Louisville whether they would hire him again. For the record, I'd bet that SOMEONE will weaken and hire him again. May God have mercy on their souls.
I think there are other things considered in firing a coach and then hiring them a year later.
I will say I am 100% sure, if they could get away with it without media scrutiny, Petrino is rehired at Arky.
Hiring a coach under a show cause order means the following:
(1) an appearance before the NCAA to discuss why they should be allowed to hire him and how they will monitor him to ensure that he does not misbehave again;
(2) additional sanctions might be leveled against the program for hiring him;
(3) the program has to submit additional reports to the NCAA every six months while the order is in effect;
(4) any new penalties incurred while the coach is employed at a given school may result in additional, meaning more severe penalties. (This is especially significant given the NCAA's new guidelines holding the HC accountable for the actions of his/her staff.);
(5) any penalties assigned to the individual carry over to his new position (including the five games/bowl ban for Tressel).
If we only had to worry about (5), it wouldn't be that bad. But given the fact that UT is on probation, do you really want to give the NCAA reason to snoop around campus even more than usual, looking for additional severe punishments to drop on us? I think Coach Tressel would be an excellent choice under most circumstances, but here it would be an unwelcome cloud hanging over us.
(If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were one of my business partners who would love to see Petrino from a fan perspective even though he really knows better.)
In his case, university policies and legal concerns certainly trump media scrutiny. His last actions in hiring his mistress in the athletic department (not the affair itself -- who cares about that) put the university at risk of an expensive and embarrasing Gloria Allred-esque lawsuit. To hell with wins and losses, he could have cost the university a year's athletic profits or more. Any university president will look at that and have a catatonic fit at the thought of bringing him in. Even if you don't expect him to have another affair or to hire another mistress, the fact that he was so willing to expose the university to such damage to its finances and reputation is and should be a major, major sticking point to any administrator. We all know that Jimmy Cheek won't ever go along with that hire!. Frankly, it will probably be a concern for NFL franchises as well.
As I said, somebody will hire him as a coach, if not this year, then next year or the next. They will win games, sell tickets, etc. And then Petrino will be Petrino, and something wicked their way comes....