FearlessFreep
Yep, it's MY fault!
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,590
- Likes
- 49
Many are making the mistake of linking the amount available to spend on a new coach to the current AD operating deficit and/or Dooley's buyout. That is false.
The only limitation on a potential coaches' salary is what Dave Hart wants to pay someone. If he deems it'll take $5M/year to get a coach to resurrect the program then I have no doubt that's what will be paid.
I keep seeing people saying UTAD can't afford to fire Dooley this year. That's a fallacy. Would you spend an additional $2M for salary in FY13 if you thought it would ultimately increase revenues by $5M as a result of increased attendance? Any buyout is handled separately and doesn't fall on the same books.
The only limitation on a potential coaches' salary is what Dave Hart wants to pay someone. If he deems it'll take $5M/year to get a coach to resurrect the program then I have no doubt that's what will be paid.
I keep seeing people saying UTAD can't afford to fire Dooley this year. That's a fallacy. Would you spend an additional $2M for salary in FY13 if you thought it would ultimately increase revenues by $5M as a result of increased attendance? Any buyout is handled separately and doesn't fall on the same books.