Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 37,227
- Likes
- 72,102
Calling people commies doesn't make you sound cool or funny. Plenty of evidence concerning Trump ties to Putin. Much like Trump, you have no real credibility.Evidence (not that you radical commies care about evidence) supports the people you vote for are puppets of Putin’s. You idiots were fed a bunch of bullschiff for years and bought every bit of it
I understand exactly what it is saying. It is saying that the Obama administration, his entire DoJ, and the D congress had intelligence that should have stopped the stupid and illegal Trumputin investigation(s).
I'm sure that you do.Mkay...
Seeing as I voted for Dumb W twice, not sure I subscribe to this slant.
They'd better hope that timeline is never mentioned to moderate undecideds. And it happens to have been declassed the day of the Presidential debate, when everyone who are interested in the election will be watching, and Trump can absolutely hammer Joe (law and order is on the ballot) Biden, who was the Vp of the dirtiest administration in history.The leftists will never believe any of that, because they would have to admit that their Dem politicians played them for suckers, and fed them lie after lie.
In case you haven’t figured it out I don’t GAF what you commie liberals say or think. If there was so much evidence your boy Weissmann’s report would have been different. This was a hoax created by people you vote forCalling people commies doesn't make you sound cool or funny. Plenty of evidence concerning Trump ties to Putin. Much like Trump, you have no real credibility.
You haven't got the first damn clue. Your mindless, immature drivel is like a broken recordIn case you haven’t figured it out I don’t GAF what you commie liberals say or think. If there was so much evidence your boy Weissmann’s report would have been different. This was a hoax created by people you vote for
Some just are not bright enough to get it. Most of those vote Democrat.Did you read it?
Timeline:
In 2016, US Intelligence received intel that Hillary's campaign plan was to demonize Trump as Russian compromised.
US intel immediately notified Obama's administration.
Obama's DoJ then spied on Trump's campaign and administration based on a dossier, purchased by Hillary's campaign, and filed with Russian claims. They lied to the FISA court to do so. all while having intel that this was Hillary's campaign plan.
They destroyed a member of rump's cabinet based on "suspicions" that he was a link to Russia, even though they knew he was a CIA asset for the US. They lied to do so.
The Mueller probe stretched on forever, smearing Trump and trying to destroy his presidency, even though there was intel that indicated that it was a Hillary campaign tactic.
Dem-controlled congress impeached him based on suspicions that intel indicated was a Hillary campaign tactic.
And you want act like this isn't an absolute MOAB?
There were plenty of witnesses. Their testimony was collected in the House hearings and was part of the Senate trial. You are confusing the Senate not calling "additional" witnesses with there not being witness testimony in the trial.
it's not a traditional trial.
the collective "meh" of the electorate tells you how well the process has been received so far. no one other than extreme partisans give a crap about it.
The point is the House gets no say in the Senate process. Refusing to send articles if you don't approve of the process is completely self defeating