BeecherVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 39,170
- Likes
- 14,459
All this talk about how great he is...well, his record isn't much better than Derek Dooley's.
Just FYI
His pro record was .540.
He could be a potential disaster that we would be stuck with for years and years.
Look...just playing devils advocate and have some questions myself. I have no doubt that he should be able to recruit. I don't know much about him, Morris, or any of the other coaches suggested that he might be bringing if he came but looking at them and what they have accomplished isn't anything that shouts home run to me. Don't get me wrong, I am all for Gruden getting the job in hopes that he can turn this around. I understand that NFL and college are completely different but it's not necessarily a given that he would be outstanding in college. The argument has been made that the superbowl he won was with Dungy's team and he was shortly fired afterwards. Morris was fired as well. I'm all about hoping he turns out well but I am less convinced that he would come in and be the home run we so desperately need. Can someone convince me?
A couple of you apparently never done any research on NFL winning percentages. Guy Chamberlin is #1 with .784, that is just slightly higher than Fulmers's .745 but you really cant even compare college to the NFL. Totally different animal.
So, just looking at the NFL. John Harbaugh and Mike Tomlin were tied at the beginning of the season at .688. The NFL is tough, there are no gimmies.
I dont get why anyone would question hiring Gruden. It would be the biggest hire in college football ever.
Gruden = better recruits.
Better recruits = more wins.
All this talk about how great he is...well, his record isn't much better than Derek Dooley's.
Just FYI
His pro record was .540.
He could be a potential disaster that we would be stuck with for years and years.