lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,765
- Likes
- 42,933
I don’t think that makes sense.
The rape was already charged and it takes two parties to agree to a plea. What prosecutor is going to dismiss a viable charge with “rape” in the title to get a conviction on a domestic assault and disorderly conduct for 2 years probation?
So there’s some reason for the reduction, which means the plea is still a reflection of the comparative bargaining strength of both parties in the negotiation. Blake was stuck in jail so his bargaining position was weak. The prosecutor can typically stall and get more jail time.
The plea is more consistent with “I want to go home” than it is with “I’m actually a rapist.”
I guess people can insist that he’s a rapist under some “guilty until proven innocent” theory, but my recollection from the Kavanaugh threads is that that type of behavior was reserved to the leftists and was frowned upon by everybody else. That type of insistence would definitely make complaints the injustice of trying a guy who is on film killing two people seem pretty inconsistent, which was the whole point of bringing it up.
I think they have a lot of choices. It seems like if the DA would have gone for something like involuntary manslaughter he would of had a better case.How many charges? I admittedly don't know what the nuts and bolts are of the counts, did the DA go balls deep for murder or were there lesser charges for like involuntary manslaughter?
Lesser offenses are generally included in a charge like murder. You can still get convicted of manslaughter, depending on how it’s defined, if you’re charged with 1st Degree Murder, the jury doesn’t find premeditation beyond a reasonable doubt, but finds the other elements.
I think they have a lot of choices. It seems like if the DA would have gone for something like involuntary manslaughter he would of had an better case.
1. Strawman. Again. How surprising.
2. Still jumping to unwarranted assumptions, as I explained in the post you just responded to.
That’s enough childish bad faith arguments from you. You’re in timeout. You can come out when you’ve shown you can can do better.
I explained my position pretty thoroughly, yesterday. I’ve yet to see a good faith response from you that makes me think further explanation is warranted, and yes, I’ve read the post you keep bumping.
Democrat Rep. Cori Bush: If Kyle Rittenhouse Acquitted, White Supremacists ‘Can Shoot at Us’
Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO) believes that if 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse gets acquitted on the grounds of self-defense, white supremacists will be emboldened to shoot at Black Lives Matter protesters.
Cori Bush: If Rittenhouse Walks, White Supremacists 'Can Shoot at Us'
What constitutes a lesser offense is a known quantity. I imagine judges keep a list since they have to get them all into the instructions.Is it normal for the lesser charges to be added at or near the end of the trial? Also, doesn’t the addition of the lesser charges signal that the prosecution is not confident in their case?
What constitutes a lesser offense is a known quantity. I imagine judges keep a list since they have to get them all into the instructions.
So nothing is really being “added” per se, it’s just whatever you are charged with comes with a known bevy of lesser included offenses.
So like in Tennessee if you’re charged with first degree murder then second degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, reckless homicide, aggravated assault, and assault will always be lesser included offenses. I’m sure there are others but it’s basically anything where all of the elements are included in the higher charge.
They’re saying the DA is no fool and didn’t want anything to do with this case (apparently has further career aspirations) - dumped it on the ADA.The ADA seemed like he learned law at a community college or one of those strip mall night class law degree mills.
Every video clip looked like he was either getting tripped up and schooled by the judge or Kyle himself.
That seems 100% plausible, but if I was running against that dude for any office I’d have Binger’s Tucker Carlson face, from when the Judge was screaming at him, in all of my ads to remind people that he was in charge of this.They’re saying the DA is no fool and didn’t want anything to do with this case (apparently has further career aspirations) - dumped it on the ADA.
But you didn't detect a pattern in all the "peaceful protests" where people were killed, beaten, and cities burned? I'll give you that republicans have plenty of issues, but most of you on the left are such hypocrites it's hilarious.You think if he's guilty they riot in celebration: if not guilty they riot in protest.
I'm detecting a pattern.
I think it was pretty stupid to go tooling around there with a gun, I also think anybody approaching somebody with a gun with intent to harm said person is stupid.
But by the law (the way I understand it anyway) it should be not guilty on all counts.
All around, it was just a stupid and tragic series of events. It’s like common sense has gone completely out the window.