Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

[Stew Cook]

I'm not against his ability to speak his mind, nor is it against my right to say I think he should STFU. So what are you trying to imply here?

That England doesn't have a first amendment. Maybe there is some equivalent.

 

[Stew Cook]

We're not stopping a pandemic though, apparently we're only delaying the inevitable

Yeah, but they all aren't the same. Expect the unexpected!

 

[37L1]

That England doesn't have a first amendment. Maybe there is some equivalent.

 

[Tennesseefan2019]

Personally i side with the protestors because the lockdown has went on long enough.

 

[Volsfaninva917]

Yeah, but they all aren't the same. Expect the unexpected!

View attachment 272656

Lol that meme

 

[Stew Cook]

Right before he was shot for speaking out?

 

[37L1]

Right before he was shot for speaking out?

That's Hyde Park's Speaker's Corner. Look carefully, he isn't the only one speaking to a crowd.

 

[Stew Cook]

That's Hyde Park's Speaker's Corner. Look carefully, he isn't the only one speaking to a crowd.

Nice to see people sharing.

 

[Stew Cook]

[/QUOTE]

Is the the predicted "Million Gun March"?

 

[LouderVol]

Yeah, but 7.1% on March 3rd (when we were discussing it originally) does.

based on what?

CNN has it around 3.4% 3300 of 88,000

https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/coronavirus-outbreak-03-02-20-intl-hnk/index.html

Holy crap you were basing your argument on approximately 100 confirmed cases? Lol gtfo of here. Seriously you are basing your argument on a sample size of 100 people in the entire US?
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-...100-coronavirus-cases-6-deaths-reported-in-us

we are currently counting cases that die WITH covid as part of the totals and are no where near 5% yet alone 7%. and that is faulty AF.

 

[LouderVol]

Like a said, a representative sample of the entirety of 330 million is at least a year away, probably more.

and yet you were willing to base your hard facts on a sample size of 100 freaking individuals. again GTFO with your high horse nonsense.

 

[Stew Cook]

based on what?

CNN has it around 3.4% 3300 of 88,000

https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/coronavirus-outbreak-03-02-20-intl-hnk/index.html

Holy crap you were basing your argument on approximately 100 confirmed cases? Lol gtfo of here. Seriously you are basing your argument on a sample size of 100 people in the entire US?
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-...100-coronavirus-cases-6-deaths-reported-in-us

we are currently counting cases that die WITH covid as part of the totals and are no where near 5% yet alone 7%. and that is faulty AF.

So, if everyone that dies after having contracted COVID is counted as a death, eventually the death rate will be 100%.

 

[vols40]

Pay for what, staying home? The whole idea is to be prepared to do it. Of course it isn't going to happen, but If we could be prepared to stop a pandemic dead in it's tracks, it would be fantastic. I guess it would work better if it was a surprise holiday, like musical chairs.

What say we deal with China first?

 

[volbeast33]

More tests doesn't mean better. Which would you think is better, testing 1% or more than 1%. I don't think we've even done that.

You show symptoms you get tested.....I don’t see what is wrong with that...... I’ve been tested and was negative...... I could have caught it the very next day..... how often should we run around testing people that aren’t sick?

 

[newyorkvol]

So, if everyone that dies after having contracted COVID is counted as a death, eventually the death rate will be 100%.

Oddly enough, that’s the way it appears to be at this point.

 

[LouderVol]

We haven’t been impressive, which is what I expect here.

no you expect to base your premise on 100 individuals in 330,000,000 to make a freaking argument.

as someone who constantly rides a high horse you need to gtfo with your nonsense.

here I will even arange the numbers in a different manner to make it more clear how dumb your assertion on 7% is.

330,000,000
100

 

[Stew Cook]

You show symptoms you get tested.....I don’t see what is wrong with that...... I’ve been tested and was negative...... I could have caught it the very next day..... how often should we run around testing people that aren’t sick?

The point being, how the tests are used is more important than how many. If we were playing the containment game, like China or S Korea did, the tests would have been put to better use, but at this point containment isn't even in a plan for us.

 

[vols40]

You show symptoms you get tested.....I don’t see what is wrong with that...... I’ve been tested and was negative...... I could have caught it the very next day..... how often should we run around testing people that aren’t sick?

Until Trump is no longer President

 

[volbeast33]

So, if everyone that dies after having contracted COVID is counted as a death, eventually the death rate will be 100%.

If they keep counting them like they are now for the next 70 years or so.

 

[LouderVol]

We call that being a Louder.

what was it called before 1989?

 

[LouderVol]

So, if everyone that dies after having contracted COVID is counted as a death, eventually the death rate will be 100%.

I don;t think 100% are getting it. and yes that is the way they are currently counting dollars. sorry I meant deaths.


no wait, I was right the first time. It would explain our friend from Ohios stance.

 

[LouderVol]

The point being, how the tests are used is more important than how many. If we were playing the containment game, like China or S Korea did, the tests would have been put to better use, but at this point containment isn't even in a plan for us.

uh yeah, I appreciate being different than Communist China.

 

[Stew Cook]

uh yeah, I appreciate being different than Communist China.

Uhmmm... so, you'd rather do things to spite China rather than do the wiser thing?

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

I doubt that it is true but stranger things have happened. I just have a hard time believing Bill Gates got hacked

It's not that Gates got hacked but the World Bank showing transfers that links him.

Edit: It does say the Gates foundation too.




Bill Gates ID2020 Exposed

 

[LouderVol]

Uhmmm... so, you'd rather do things to spite China rather than do the wiser thing?

if it comes to the "greater good", yes I would do something to spite China in order to protect individuals rights.