Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#44,179
#44,179
allvol123 said:
You are literally a joke on here.

The facts are not what you state. They are the ramblings of someone that is quite clueless.
Click to expand...

Again, you bring nothing, just criticize. It’s a pattern. My facts are what is being reported by federal agencies. Your facts are apparently made up in your head.
 
#44,181
#44,181
OHvol40 said:
More tests per million? May want to check that again.
Click to expand...

Tests per million are so inconsequential. Fact is all lefties and the MSM are hoping for high death counts so much so they are being deceitfully exaggerated. Experts say that testing all 300+ million in this country is not what is needed. But go ahead with your stupid per million comparisons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#44,182
#44,182
37L1 said:
More tests, period. Name another country with the same or greater population that has done more.
Click to expand...

Lol so according to you testing 2 people out of 300,000,000 is better than testing 1 out of 10. Maybe you’ll see the flawed logic there if I give you enough time.
 
#44,184
#44,184
OHvol40 said:
And all you’ve got is criticism, no intelligible input, so what good are you really?

The accuracy of numbers (or lack thereof) is a direct reflection of tests per million, which the US has done terribly. So lack of surveillance is not my concern. I have to deal with the facts presented, not the facts that you prefer to assume.
Click to expand...

There is no way anyone could argue numbers with this thing based on how inaccurate the reporting is and guidelines for reporting it . It’s not just about the testing per million when health care officials that are reporting data can assume a positive result without a test then put that data in a specific column for the “experts “ to use as a model .
 
  • Like
Reactions: newyorkvol
#44,186
#44,186
OHvol40 said:
Again, you bring nothing, just criticize. It’s a pattern. My facts are what is being reported by federal agencies. Your facts are apparently made up in your head.
Click to expand...

They arent facts. They are the projections from someone that doesnt comprehend what is actually going on.

Lancet, projected 0.66%. Standford anti body study extrapolated their results to between 0.1 and 0.2 percent.

Based on your numbers and the fact that many believe 50% of the population will get this, we are looking at 9 million deaths.

Congrats, you've outdone Dr. Fauci.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol and vols40
#44,187
#44,187
vols40 said:
Tests per million are so inconsequential. Fact is all lefties and the MSM are hoping for high death counts so much so they are being deceitfully exaggerated. Experts say that testing all 300+ million in this country is not what is needed. But go ahead with your stupid per million comparisons.
Click to expand...

If you want to lower that mortality rate so bad (as if it changes the death toll) and there is a high presumptive undetected infection rate in the population, you think you’d want as many people as possible to be tested... but what do I know?
 
#44,188
#44,188
OHvol40 said:
Lol so according to you testing 2 people out of 300,000,000 is better than testing 1 out of 10. Maybe you’ll see the flawed logic there if I give you enough time.
Click to expand...
This just proves that you are not playing with a full deck. You just posted a logical fallacy as if it were a valid argument. It's not. Try harder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#44,191
#44,191
0nelilreb said:
There is no way anyone could argue numbers with this thing based on how inaccurate the reporting is and guidelines for reporting it . It’s not just about the testing per million when health care officials that are reporting data can assume a positive result without a test then put that data in a specific column for the “experts “ to use as a model .
Click to expand...

There are also a LOT of positive facility tests that come back negative from the CDC or State on a confirmatory test. So there are falsehoods pulling both directions... therefore I just go by what’s reported. What else is there to do? Unless you want to make up your own numbers/facts.
 
#44,192
#44,192
OHvol40 said:
And all you’ve got is criticism, no intelligible input, so what good are you really?

The accuracy of numbers (or lack thereof) is a direct reflection of tests per million, which the US has done terribly. So lack of surveillance is not my concern. I have to deal with the facts presented, not the facts that you prefer to assume.
Click to expand...
We’ve not done terribly at testing.
 
#44,193
#44,193
allvol123 said:
They arent facts. They are the projections from someone that doesnt comprehend what is actually going on.

Lancet, projected 0.66%. Standford anti body study extrapolated their results to between 0.1 and 0.2 percent.

Based on your numbers and the fact that many believe 50% of the population will get this, we are looking at 9 million deaths.

Congrats, you've outdone Dr. Fauci.
Click to expand...


I haven’t done anything but regurgitate what is reported from state and federal agencies.
 
#44,194
#44,194
OHvol40 said:
And that represents the US?
Click to expand...

It represents the earliest hotspot.
allvol123 said:
They arent facts. They are the projections from someone that doesnt comprehend what is actually going on.

Lancet, projected 0.66%. Standford anti body study extrapolated their results to between 0.1 and 0.2 percent.

Based on your numbers and the fact that many believe 50% of the population will get this, we are looking at 9 million deaths.

Congrats, you've outdone Dr. Fauci.
Click to expand...

Nancy and the left approve of these numbers
 
#44,195
#44,195
37L1 said:
This just proves that you are not playing with a full deck. You just posted a logical fallacy as if it were a valid argument. It's not. Try harder.
Click to expand...

Lol that’s the point you’re making, now stand behind it or stand down.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top