Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

Might not be a good idea to have an agitated group of protesters wandering the capitol halls with firearms. Just my humble opinion though.
Maybe those in the halls shouldnt agitate the group and actually represent the people of the state instead of the largest voting bloc.
 
You don't seem to have any grasp on the science behind this disease
Mi can’t speak for anyone but myself . The more I hear and see if this “ science “ and these “ scientists experts “ relying on these “ expert scientific studies / models “ the less I care about all of these scientists and their “options”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
Mi can’t speak for anyone but myself . The more I hear and see if this “ science “ and these “ scientists experts “ relying on these “ expert scientific studies / models “ the less I care about all of these scientists and their “options”.


Mi? You Chinese?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
Do you realize that you keep pointing out how badly ran an extremely liberal city is ? It’s odd the things that this “ pandemic “ and the Trump administration is bringing out by letting the governors and mayors have full control of their states instead of the attention being focused solely on the feds isn’t it ?

And if the the DNC replaces Biden with Cuomo EL will be singing his praises.
 


This is a little eye-rolling.

CA had almost 300 cases when Newsome shut down restaurants, etc. on 3/15.

In TX, I started working from home on the 15th - as did pretty much most of the jobs that could in Houston (roads were obviously less busy) and the large cities took the lead in shutting down restaurants, etc. Houston shut things down on 3/20. On 3/20, Texas had almost 200 cases. So, relative to the virus's progress in TX, Houston (which was one of the early cities to be impacted in TX) shut down faster than Newsome shut down CA.

Point being, Texans were not running around, not shut down, hanging out at beaches (has anyone been to a TX beach? You don't hang out there unless it's down south). So it seems like a bad comparison to try to make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grey_pilgrim
Maybe those in the halls shouldnt agitate the group and actually represent the people of the state instead of the largest voting bloc.
These “grassroots” protesters where from other states, not just residents of the state where the protest happen. On top of that, the protesters are a very vocal minority, somewhere around 60% of Americans support the shutdown.

Only 12% of Americans say the measures where they live go too far. About twice as many people, 26%, believe the limits don’t go far enough. The majority of Americans — 61% — feel the steps taken by government officials to prevent infections of COVID-19 in their area are about right.

Outbreak poll: Most Americans favor continued lockdown
 
To intimidate. It is a threat.
As is any protest.

Protesting is what happens when the government refuses to listen to it's people.

If they want us to toe the line they also have to toe the line. The government has inarguably taken things up a notch, why cant the people?
 
As is any protest.

Protesting is what happens when the government refuses to listen to it's people.

If they want us to toe the line they also have to toe the line. The government has inarguably taken things up a notch, why cant the people?
A peaceful protest, which is the legal kind, is not a threat. An armed protest could easily turned into an insurrection.
 
So you are saying it is ok to intimidate legislators with rifles and handguns? Sounds like a fascist takeover or some banana republic.
You're right, only the authorities should have weapons. Easier to control that way

Citizens are threatened every day through actions of legislators. Their enforcers have rifles and handguns
 

VN Store



Back
Top