hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 117,023
- Likes
- 169,748
So on this we all agree. However that is a reflection of their personal views requiring no personal information disclosure in my part.Not 1 bit. I miss choices and bigots being easily identifiable.
It's amazing how many so called conservatives don't really believe in personal freedom.
You’re reinforcing nosy catty behavior for no valid reason.Feminine? I didn't realize opposing restrictions on business is a feminine trait.
You’re reinforcing nosy catty behavior for no valid reason.
But on the underlying premise pretty much all of us going back and forth agree on. We want businesses that behave badly to display that bad behavior proudly so we can give them the finger and take our business elsewhere.
As a business owner, why don’t you tell us?
I agree that the constitution specifically is a limitation on the federal government. I also use it to point out that what is good for limiting government is good for limiting needless nosy businesses![]()
Depends on the discrimination.It would pull the curtain on hard core bigots and expose them. It would open opportunities to compete against companies that openly discriminate and consumers could make better informed decisions.
Let's face it, businesses discriminate every day they are just creative in how it's done. Few things would change if the laws were rescinded, with social media you can't get away with open discrimination anymore.
No one should accept that. A private citizen (business) should be free to discriminate freely and openly.