Let's compare Jesus and Muhammed (and debate homosexuality) (and Tombstone).

#127
#127
Tenacious D said:
My bad.

Perhaps reviewing the word "empirical" would be of some benefit.

Once done, try anew.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

empirical : originating in or based on observation or experience.

Seems any one who saw Jesus could provide empirical evidence he was a man. Not sure if the referenced scripture provides testement but works by any number of thousands of theologians or historians could help you out.
 
#129
#129
CSVol said:
empirical : originating in or based on observation or experience.

Seems any one who saw Jesus could provide empirical evidence he was a man. Not sure if the referenced scripture provides testement but works by any number of thousands of theologians or historians could help you out.
Click to expand...

Over 500 people saw him after he was resurrected.
 
#136
#136
Tenacious D said:
Your statement seems both naive and in contrast to Mark 9:24 - at least as I have been told, having never read it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Sorry man, you can't move back and forth between there being a God about some things, and not others. There either is a God you believe in, or there isn't, and you dictate what you do. There is no either or, and trying to quote me scripture without even read it, is like giving me relationship advice and never having a girlfriend.
 
#138
#138
g8terh8ter_eric said:
So, you haven't even read my empirical evidence?? Interesting.
Click to expand...

It's hearsay. I included the definition earlier. Can you give me the actual name of the Gospel writers? Can you tell me who their family members were? Where they lived? What positions they held? Can you even tell me the exact date these "evidential" writings were written?

Oh, these things are unknown...shucks.

Maybe you can tell me where Q originated from...
 
#140
#140
CSVol said:
empirical : originating in or based on observation or experience.

Seems any one who saw Jesus could provide empirical evidence he was a man. Not sure if the referenced scripture provides testement but works by any number of thousands of theologians or historians could help you out.
Click to expand...

This explains why there is universal acceptance of Jesus' human life and deitiistic status. Is that correct?

And who are these "thousands of theologians or historians" who witnessed these things, again?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#142
#142
g8terh8ter_eric said:
Sorry man, you can't move back and forth between there being a God about some things, and not others. There either is a God you believe in, or there isn't, and you dictate what you do. There is no either or, and trying to quote me scripture without even read it, is like giving me relationship advice and never having a girlfriend.
Click to expand...
What part of 'not sure' is confusing? I don't you see why there can't be a gap.
 
#144
#144
therealUT said:
It's hearsay. I included the definition earlier. Can you give me the actual name of the Gospel writers? Can you tell me who their family members were? Where they lived? What positions they held? Can you even tell me the exact date these "evidential" writings were written?

Oh, these things are unknown...shucks.

Maybe you can tell me where Q originated from...
Click to expand...

It's hearsay?? You do realize that the way they did the history back then was by word of mouth, and most historians agree that to do what they did and maintain that history throughout the years, until finally a manuscript was agreed upon, is not only astonishing, but nearly impossible without some type of divine intervention.
 
#150
#150
tvolsfan said:
What are you referring to here? Sorry if you already mentioned them.
Click to expand...

Milo was too narrow-minded and intolerably encumbered to hear a Baptist minister's position on homosexuality and the fate of mankind's very existence.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top