What are you ranting about? You sound angry.
Are you upset there are social media sites in Russia? I don’t understand.
Wow. Let's see here...
Syria. Again, why are we there? No, really, why are we there? Is there a single benefit to the average American from us being "involved" in Syria? And if we are killing Russians there, then why are we so indignant about anything they do in return? When was the last Russian airstrike that killed Americans?
Russia. Probably the most active nation in the world when it comes to intelligence gathering, counter-intelligence, manipulation, interference, etc. Yep, right up there with the CIA. Count the known instances where one nation has attempted to, or has, sparked a revolution, coup, or political pole shift. Russia...and the US...are in the Top 2. They're just better at it than us right now. Remember, your poli-science professor in college was one of those liberal bleeding hearts you fuss about now. They taught you our version of the truth.
Vietnam. Johnson's War. Yes, they provided ample and active aid to North Vietnam. So did China. But nobody's looking at the simple fact that a political coup in the United States (of all places) led to a war in a nation that we had no business being in to begin with. Seriously, Vietnam? What were we worried about, the global rice market? Humane treatment of water buffalo? Helping Francis Ford Coppola with his cinematic career? Oh...by the way...we lost. And as of this date, what threat to the United States does Vietnam pose?
Look, I'm retired military, law enforcement veteran, and as conservative as they come. But it absolutely amazes me that the same people who talk about "fake news" and not believing anything the media says will gobble up anything that fits their agenda. Here's a simple test. Most of us have kids. Mine are grown and gone. Go look in the mirror, and ask yourself this question: Am I willing to send my son / daughter / grandchild to (insert nation) to die for what I believe is right?
Unless it's "yes", we don't need to be there. Period.
God Bless all. If I'm wrong, it's for the right reasons.
There's no "good" options here, but some are worse than others.
Thank you for not replying to my post
Oh, PG will eventually try to drag you down to his third grade level.
I did like your posts about Patton and the WWII/III thing with Russia. Though I'm not sure he was assassinated.
Nah.lol
It was funny when Trump attacked that airbase and introduced troops everyone was saying "ERMAHGERD! Trump's going to get us into a war with Russia!"
Now that he's talking about pulling out it's "ERMAHGERD! WE NEED THOSE TROOPS THERE!"
There is no happy medium with you people.
Nah.
It’s the fact that Trump blunders around saying/tweeting stupid stuff, hiring incompetent people, blatantly lying, and doing things that signal his lack of competence. Not many people still trust him to do the competent thing and surely nobody trusts him to do the morally right thing.
So, when Trump decides to do something followed by reports that he’s just going on instinct and hasn’t consulted the few administration people that the public actually trusts, and then those trusted people corroborate those reports by quitting their jobs in protest, people criticize the president.
No sane person looks at their respective bodies of work and decides to trust Trump over Mattis when it comes to foreign policy or military policy.
You hijack a reply to another, provide a lot of blathering BS but fail to address the point - - so our government has been engaging is a program to divide and conquer the Russian population. - - but typlical Rightie. Angry? No! Happy to point up your empty suit
Including more dead Americans for a cause that we honestly have no interest in.
Can someone remind me what the original idea behind the UN was?
Afghanistan isn't our problem . . . until it is.
ISIS isn't our problem . . . until it is.
As I've said, I have no commitment to having U.S. troops in Syria. But do we have any plan now to contain ISIS? It grew once, it could grow again.
I don't know if using the word "predominantly" is accurate or not. However, it is a fact that Donald Trump's largest constituency of support is from white men in either the midwest or the southeast regions of the United States, who have not earned at least a Bachelor's degree.The libs like to crow that male Trump voters are predominantly not college educated. I’d guess most of the posters in here, like myself, have at least one sheepskin from UT.