Maui fire. What is going on?

San Francisco was a very nice place. That's teh entire point it's current condition was done on purpose....to clear it out. People think the tent cities, drug infestation, homelessness, riots etc are a result of mere naive midmanagement, and I am saying that is not the case...naive voters to be sure. However these are controlled demolitions of urban areas to clear areas out, and get ready for the technocratic remake.

Maybe, just maybe, the explanation is that the liberals in San Francisco are actually just bad at policy-making and urban development is also happening. IDK, call me crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
Watching the bozo squad try to pin the Hawaiian fires on space lasers, Joe and the new world order is low hanging fruit.

Light work.
There was no conspiracy.

Just gross negligence on the part of the people in charge of maintaining the power line infrastructure. And a gross misallocation of funds.
 
Maybe, just maybe, the explanation is that the liberals in San Francisco are actually just bad at policy-making and urban development is also happening. IDK, call me crazy.
Well they are all Democrat so I see the wisdom in your theory. However the systimatic nature of following the same proven failure across the country among many different leaders, and the the support of financial institutions like Block Rock for the same failed economic policies, and then their moving in to buy property after those areas property values crash might just maybe support a different theory.
 
There was no conspiracy.

Just gross negligence on the part of the people in charge of maintaining the power line infrastructure. And a gross misallocation of funds.

Are you sure, becuase directed energy weapons and a global "reset" by the New World Order sounds more plausible.
 
Well they are all Democrat so I see the wisdom in your theory. However the systimatic nature of following the same proven failure across the country among many different leaders, and the the support of financial institutions like Block Rock for the same failed economic policies, and then their moving in to buy property after those areas property values crash might just maybe support a different theory.

And Republicans are so good at policymaking, right?

Both parties are **** at policy. Maybe Republicans are slightly better, IDK, it's just hard to know since big cities are harder to manage. I'm from a small town and the Republicans are doing a great job to drive up the cost of living for no good reason. For example, policies have made it so that it doesn't make sense to build starter homes. You either build duplexes/4plexes, or monstrosities and prices for the old, existing starter homes are ridiculously high. Make the city 30x bigger. Make the government 30x bigger, and this **** gets out of control.
 
I think it's pretty funny that you'd have the audacity to come in here acting like you actually care what Hawaiians think.

UNLESS they're mad at Joe for not personally leading the search and rescue efforts.

At least this clown has the balls to say what he's thinking, dumb as it may be.
That's not from having balls. That's from a combination of low IQ, entitlement, and senility.
 
Last edited:
And Republicans are so good at policymaking, right?

Both parties are **** at policy. Maybe Republicans are slightly better, IDK, it's just hard to know since big cities are harder to manage. I'm from a small town and the Republicans are doing a great job to drive up the cost of living for no good reason. For example, policies have made it so that it doesn't make sense to build starter homes. You either build duplexes/4plexes, or monstrosities and prices for the old, existing starter homes are ridiculously high. Make the city 30x bigger. Make the government 30x bigger, and this **** gets out of control.
Do those on the City Council seem more affluent than before they tilted the regs toward that type of housing? Or are they honest but just stupid?
 
Has anyone actually mentioned the space lasers except in jest?

Here? I don't know. Probably.

It's all over the web though and given that a natural disaster is being thrust into the political forum, it's likely the conspiracy nutz have rolled it out on the field.

Fact check: Maui fires caused by directed energy weapons? – DW – 08/17/2023

No, directed energy weapons didn't cause Maui fires | Fact check (usatoday.com)

Were Maui wildfires caused by a US weapons test? — Radio Free Asia (rfa.org)

Hawaii wildfires: 'Directed energy weapon' and other false claims go viral (yahoo.com)
 
Do those on the City Council seem more affluent than before they tilted the regs toward that type of housing? Or are they honest but just stupid?

IDK enough about the members of city council to say anything about that, I don't live there anymore...but the mayor was the daughter of the wealthiest developer in town. She was only like 28 when she first won office. Won again. Then got ousted last election after trying to talk about the cost of living in town. It was pretty hilarious because she mentioned she could barely afford a town house (she's a lawyer and her husband is a doctor) and so a local journalist started investigating and found out that she had a primary residence in another county, and it was a mansion. She was calling that her primary for tax purposes and pretending the town home was her primary so she could be mayor. #scandal
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
It's good to see these hypocrites are so concerned with their climate change agenda.
They want to bring along 50 cars to drive all over the island & pollute the atmosphere.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83

Seems to me that people claiming "climate change" as the reason are just as guilty as the directed energy weapons folks for being asinine.
 
Seems to me that people claiming "climate change" as the reason are just as guilty as the directed energy weapons folks for being asinine.

I think they are hastily jumping to a conclusion, but at least it's a conclusion that isn't crazy.
 
I think they are hastily jumping to a conclusion, but at least it's a conclusion that isn't crazy.

Pretty crazy...

Literally scientists came out in the aftermath letting people know it wasn't "climate change" as the reason for the fire. Land mismanagement, weather and a hoop of human factors were far more to blame than catchy phrases.

But they got drowned out by the mouthbreathers screeching about climate change being the ultimate villain here.

So, yes, once again the party of "science" stops listening to the scientists because it upsets their narrative. Which means they are just as crazy as those who think microwave weapons were the cause.
 
Pretty crazy...

Literally scientists came out in the aftermath letting people know it wasn't "climate change" as the reason for the fire. Land mismanagement, weather and a hoop of human factors were far more to blame than catchy phrases.

But they got drowned out by the mouthbreathers screeching about climate change being the ultimate villain here.

So, yes, once again the party of "science" stops listening to the scientists because it upsets their narrative. Which means they are just as crazy as those who think microwave weapons were the cause.

So as crazy as space lasers?

Scientists literally have also explained that hot weather is a contributing factor, and not sure any have said space lasers are.
 
So as crazy as space lasers?

Scientists literally have also explained that hot weather is a contributing factor, and not sure any have said space lasers are.

Hot weather contributes to fires?

That sounds like groundbreaking science talk there...

Look, I'll give you "factor" but too many times these things are attributed to just "climate change." Take the fires in Canada this year. (Or California every year) that automatically get chalked up as climate change. Most fire ecologists in Canada blame forest mismanagement as the primary culprit for the fires this year. And those in California talk about how "expensive" fires are now. Not taking into account how expensive it is to build in California to begin with and how people are moving away from cities where the dangers are higher.

Forests, especially those in California, are meant to burn every so often. Not only that, but you have scientists literally saying we should be letting them burn on their own accord since that's what nature intends. It's not nature's fault humans decided to build homes where the natural fires happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh
Hot weather contributes to fires?

That sounds like groundbreaking science talk there...

Look, I'll give you "factor" but too many times these things are attributed to just "climate change." Take the fires in Canada this year. (Or California every year) that automatically get chalked up as climate change. Most fire ecologists in Canada blame forest mismanagement as the primary culprit for the fires this year. And those in California talk about how "expensive" fires are now. Not taking into account how expensive it is to build in California to begin with and how people are moving away from cities where the dangers are higher.

Forests, especially those in California, are meant to burn every so often. Not only that, but you have scientists literally saying we should be letting them burn on their own accord since that's what nature intends. It's not nature's fault humans decided to build homes where the natural fires happen.

The conversation is about whether or not it's as crazy to blame CC as it is to blame space lasers. You shouldn't be a smartass when I'm the one saying it's not as crazy.
 

VN Store



Back
Top