orange parmejohn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
- Messages
- 15,119
- Likes
- 10,371
No that doesn't make any sense. In my analogy the cash (stealing signs) is 100% your money and your right to have it. There's no need to use a gun. Remember, stealing signs isn't the problem. It's HOW they were stolen which makes no sense to try to enforce.So if I go to a bank with a gun instead of an ATM card and leave with a crapload of cash, can I argue I did something legal (withdraw cash) in an illegal way (armed robbery) and everything will be cool?
Again, I stand by my notion that this is all hogwash and his increase in winning is due just to this then? Nah. I believe teams do scouting all the time. It's no matter really we don't have a say either way.
You are WAY off here. Michigan in-person scouted which is illegal. Whether or not you agree it should be illegal, it is. They then digitally recorded the signals from the coaches which is also illegal. Then they had unlimited time to do codebreaking in order to identify what each team was calling onto the field which breaks the game of football (hence why the other two are illegal).
What you keep insinuating is that's no different than watching game film and then trying to steal signs on a Saturday. It is VERY different than that. If during the course of a game, your sideline is able to break the playcalling code of the other team, that is completely fine. However, if you illegally scout, illegally record, and then have unlimited time for codebreaking IN ADVANCE of the game, well you're a huge cheater. There's no other way to look at it.
This is ridiculously similar to what the Red Sox got caught doing in MLB. They were also punished because cheating is bad.
The question in my mind right now, is if this is true and Michigan wins out, will the NCAA let them participate in the playoffs with this out there?
It needs to be cleared up quickly. If Michigan has anything to dispute this, they need to put it out there and it can't be the "coach didn't know excuse". That is saying .. yes it is true but forgive us because our head coach didn't know.
I feel for the players - but when I look at the OSU clip, it is like the players knew too.
In person scouting is only illegal because of an outdated rule meant to save on travel costs, not prevent sign stealing and to my knowledge digitally recording coaches on the sidelines is not illegal.You are WAY off here. Michigan in-person scouted which is illegal. Whether or not you agree it should be illegal, it is. They then digitally recorded the signals from the coaches which is also illegal. Then they had unlimited time to do codebreaking in order to identify what each team was calling onto the field which breaks the game of football (hence why the other two are illegal).
Your knowledge is lackingIn person scouting is only illegal because of an outdated rule meant to save on travel costs, not prevent sign stealing and to my knowledge digitally recording coaches on the sidelines is not illegal.
I was unaware of that rule but my original commentary still stands and I stand by itYour knowledge is lacking
"NCAA rules do not directly ban the stealing of signs. There are rules against using electronic equipment to record an opponent's signals,"
Investigation of Michigan for sign-stealing stems from NCAA rules made to curb financial advantages
Or is that rule also "outdated" and inspite of still being in the rulebook, UM isn't required to follow it just like the rule on in-person scouting?
Lol so you're saying if I am good enough to steal your signs in real time then I deserve to steal them but I can't do it in advance. That's like saying if a hacker is good enough to guess your password then it's legal for him to take all your money but if he takes a photo of your password you left on your desk then it's illegal. Nope try again. it makes no sense. Either stealing signs is illegal or it's not illegal. Period. How you steal them should not be the issue. I completely disagree. If you want to make sign stealing illegal then be my guest, but you can't say stealing signs is cheating in one case and not cheating in another case.
I'll have to go find it. It was on twitter and showed the assistant who did all this standing next to Harbough looking across the sidelines on I believe the first play - and he plus the entire team reacted to alert the defense it was going to be a pass play.OSU clip?
It was insurance in case they lost to THE OHIO STATE….
Michigan fans are twisting this to make it not be "illegal" with the excuse everyone does this.
Ignoring that for a minute, if one really believes this is acceptable then each team should just trade signs / signals before the game starts - better yet, the offense and defense should share what plays they are going to run before every play so both can adjust.
However, doing it in person and recording all signals for the whole games gives you enough data to figure out the signals from the first play of the game.I don't like Michigan for sure but I am not letting that blind me from seeing how foolish all this hubbub is. The NCAA is using a rule that wasn't designed to prevent cheating to make it look like Michigan was somehow doing something other schools dont do all the time (steal signs, steal playbooks, bug the opposing locker room etc). The notion that this is all about Michigan being a bunch of dirty cheaters is all way way overblown due mostly to the NCAA trying to remain relevant.
You must be a Houston Astros fan.Lol so you're saying if I am good enough to steal your signs in real time then I deserve to steal them but I can't do it in advance. That's like saying if a hacker is good enough to guess your password then it's legal for him to take all your money but if he takes a photo of your password you left on your desk then it's illegal. Nope try again. it makes no sense. Either stealing signs is illegal or it's not illegal. Period. How you steal them should not be the issue. I completely disagree. If you want to make sign stealing illegal then be my guest, but you can't say stealing signs is cheating in one case and not cheating in another case.