Oh BS...
You see what you want to see on Fox. WTF else are they supposed to call them? Clarence and Roger? They are leaning towards the terror threat yes, but have not gone out screaming about radical Muslims or anything else save that dimwit retired General.
OK, tech gurus: what is the "new" satellite data that Inmarsat used to establish the plane's supposed last location? And why did it take two weeks to figure this out?
But they didn't find that box from the pinging. They found the wreckage through other means.
OK, tech gurus: what is the "new" satellite data that Inmarsat used to establish the plane's supposed last location? And why did it take two weeks to figure this out?
Beg to differ. They've been pretty much always bringing all of their coverage around to that angle.
I think it might have just taken a while to go through the satellites data and the new information is the same as the old information with the difference being its been properly analyzed.
Let's see, most of the information pointed towards terrorism or as a minimum a lone wolf action. The communications and ACARS being shut down and the radical change in direction? And why wouldn't they mention the names of the pilots? Why wouldn't they lean towards the possibility of that?
It's not like Fox was bringing up the black hole theories. Your seething hatred of them shines yet again...