More Climate BS...

#2,676
#2,676
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm no expert on this. It doesn't appear that you are either. I'm posting data collected by scientists who have researched the topic, as part of their jobs. In other words, people who understand that satellite technology can be used to measure sea levels.
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with being an expert on anything.

Let's say for argument sake that the sea levels are rising, so what? Haven't they not existed in history and been higher in history? What's the problem? What are the sea levels suppose to be at?

You actually sound like you need to be locked up at this point.
 
#2,682
#2,682
hog88 said:
You have and I understand why you disagree.

It's all a mute point anyway. The poles reversing again would cause catastrophic economic damage, the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation stopping would lead to mass die offs of people, plants and animals and of course the sun will kill us off at some point. Man's effect of the climate is way on down the list of what we should be worried about.
Click to expand...
The Yellowstone Supervolcano erupting should be on your list, meteor strikes, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, MemphisVol77, GroverCleveland and 2 others
#2,685
#2,685
LSU-SIU said:
Give or take they really haven't in 100+ years but even flux would be normal, if it didn't change I would say it would be abnormal i.e. cycles. The planet will continue to change and cycles, with cycles within the cycles i.e. nature.
Click to expand...

Agreed, is it water rising or is it the continents moving?

History / Geologists / Archeologists etc. have determined that water levels have risen at different times throughout history.....before anyone's industrial revolution, to even Noah and the Ark type levels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland and LSU-SIU
#2,687
#2,687
Climate change activists lost me when taxing people became the solution.

Most if not all climate change activists estimate the earth to be millions, if not billions of years old. Yet we only have accurate climate data going back to about 150 years at most. In what other field of science do you draw concrete conclusions based on a sample size of 0.00003% of the possible data? And yet that sample size is what they are relying on to call it “settled science”
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, Vol since 77, Vol423 and 1 other person
#2,688
#2,688
We've only been keeping Temp records for what 130 - 150 years??

Science is funny, we can send ppl to the moon, they can predict climate change but can't cure cancer, the common cold, diabetes, etc. etc. etc. ....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#2,689
#2,689
Vol423 said:
Accelerated? You're adorable. Accelerated since when? What's the acceptable rate? How was that acceptable rate determined?
Click to expand...
NASA's description. Not mine. I have already posts links which provide answers to some of these questions.

.... but is NASA adorable too? LOL.
 
#2,691
#2,691
Cod said:
We've only been keeping Temp records for what 130 - 150 years??

Science is funny, we can send ppl to the moon, they can predict climate change but can't cure cancer, the common cold, diabetes, etc. etc. etc. ....
Click to expand...

The planet use to be much warmer. The last thing Humans want is another long hard Ice Age i.e. death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#2,692
#2,692
BowlBrother85 said:
NASA's description. Not mine. I have already posts links which provide answers to some of these questions.

.... but is NASA adorable too? LOL.
Click to expand...

It doesn't answer any questions.

Okay, so what are the sea levels suppose to be? You seem to be very concerned.
 
#2,693
#2,693
LSU-SIU said:
A good portion of southern Louisiana if not a good portion of the gulf coast would be underwater decades ago by just a few feet of sea level change. I have friends still living where the house is on stilts. And he is calling people ignorant while probably wearing a double diaper on his face. So, at best he has a disputed fact. But than we have to have cause and effect, but he really isn't even bringing in enough facts.

Its no different than the old the globe is going to be an ice cube, but even than you have to prove cause and effect.

Click to expand...


So this is what existed before Popular Science and Popular Mechanics went their separate ways huh?? I have always read and liked both.
 
#2,694
#2,694
This gives an even-handed take on rising sea levels. It's not all gloom and doom, and most of it is not attributed to man-made activity, or even regarded as being near a crisis level.

www.climate.gov

Interactive map: How has local sea level in the United States changed over time?

Use this interactive map to browse a collection of animated gifs showing monthly sea level at U.S. tide-monitoring stations over their lifetimes.
www.climate.gov www.climate.gov
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#2,695
#2,695
  • Like
Reactions: SlipKidVol
#2,696
#2,696
McDad said:
There is evidence, in another field of study, that when data is found which goes against the narrative, the researchers are inclined to bury it for fear of being ostracized and excommunicated. And rather than be encouraged by their peers to get the truth out, are advised by those peers to sit on the findings.
Click to expand...
I’ve come point of view that most research is fake and manipulated. Research shows:
cholesterol is bad
sodium bad
food pyramid
myplate
6 feet stops the spread (somehow its 1.5 meters in Europe)
covid vaccine safe and effective
cloth masks stop viruses
ozone is dying
sunlight is bad
etc,etc,etc

I think we have to be comfortable living in a world of uncertainty in science and history. We don’t know as much as we think we do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, Orange_Vol1321, McDad and 1 other person
#2,699
#2,699
marcusluvsvols said:
So this is what existed before Popular Science and Popular Mechanics went their separate ways huh?? I have always read and liked both.
Click to expand...

I posted some of the information on the Popular Science predictions. Of course, the flipped flopped over the past 100+ years. When I was in elementary school it was about the global ice age.

Scams.

March 1, 1912: Article Links Coal Burning and Global Temperatures

With that said, I think Humans do have an impact on the environment, duhhh everything does. However, as far as some mass thing as far as global temperature, even if it was measurable there is no way of linking the cause and effect as one can't see outside of about 100-200 years.

5_0.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top