hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 115,382
- Likes
- 165,030
There’s nothing “scientific” about climate change research.The GOP is begrudgingly starting to acknowledge the science, but their response is "So what, I'll just buy more sunscreen and get a better AC." They conveniently ignore the externalities that we're starting to see (extreme weather-related damage; climate migrants) -- and will see even more of in the future.
That's not what they're sayingThis year greenhouse gases actually decreased. Good luck finding that research data.
That's not what they're saying
Greenhouse Emissions Rise to Record, Erasing Drop During Pandemic
Emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases plunged 4.6 percent in 2020, as lockdowns in the first half of the year restricted global mobility and hampered economic activity. Many hoped that this would mark the beginning of a more permanent shift downwards in emissions.www.imf.org
Don't worry about science, just step outside. How many 4+ inch snows have we had in the last five years? How many 4"+ snows did we have in any 5 year period in the 60s? How deep is the snow pack in glacier national park? How deep was it in the 70s?There’s nothing “scientific” about climate change research.
These are the guys who have been caught faking climate data 3 separate times. These are the guys who get absolutely nothing right in their predictions. These are the guys who eliminate any study from consideration that doesn’t agree with their preconceived notions. That’s not science.
Don't worry about science, just step outside. How many 4+ inch snows have we had in the last five years? How many 4"+ snows did we have in any 5 year period in the 60s? How deep is the snow pack in glacier national park? How deep was it in the 70s?
To all who have asked, that's what I mean by deniers.
So don't worry about this scientist vs that scientist, don't chatter about politicians. Just let common sense guide you. And again I ask just what you have against cleaning up our environment? The one you inherited should be as good or better than the one you leave.
How many ice ages have been caused by man?Don't worry about science, just step outside. How many 4+ inch snows have we had in the last five years? How many 4"+ snows did we have in any 5 year period in the 60s? How deep is the snow pack in glacier national park? How deep was it in the 70s?
To all who have asked, that's what I mean by deniers.
So don't worry about this scientist vs that scientist, don't chatter about politicians. Just let common sense guide you. And again I ask just what you have against cleaning up our environment? The one you inherited should be as good or better than the one you leave.
There is a profound difference betweenDon't worry about science, just step outside. How many 4+ inch snows have we had in the last five years? How many 4"+ snows did we have in any 5 year period in the 60s? How deep is the snow pack in glacier national park? How deep was it in the 70s?
To all who have asked, that's what I mean by deniers.
So don't worry about this scientist vs that scientist, don't chatter about politicians. Just let common sense guide you. And again I ask just what you have against cleaning up our environment? The one you inherited should be as good or better than the one you leave.
I’m an avid nature lover. I don’t give 2 ***** what the city dwellers on the left think about climate change. The reality is that micro plastics are going to kill us long before their pretend crisis ever gets close to having a chance.There is a profound difference between
“Man should be better custodians of the environment”
-and-
“Man is the cause of the current iteration of climate change”