MTG Calls for Red State Secession

[ClearwaterVol]

How's that a story? Isn't the answer to that always yes?

The story as it was presented by the msm was "Russian's helped Trump steal the election".

Never heard the word steal until trump started in with his stupidity

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Yes, we accepted that some parents suck and found a way to help the children. Does that mean as technology improves and we can save these babies through artificial wombs, that you support saving all savable aborted fetuses?

If you want to

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Your side has said the same thing

Comedian vs Congresswoman?

 

[tvolsfan]

The Czechs and Slovaks say hey. And the ex-USSR.

I did think of the velvet divorce as an example. Not sure the USSR should count seeing as they used violent reprisals as for as long as they could.

 

[EasternVol]

I did think of the velvet divorce as an example. Not sure the USSR should count seeing as they used violent reprisals as for as long as they could.

Good point. I was thinking of the 90's and overlooked what they did to Hungary e.g. in the 50's.

 

[Vol8188]

Never heard the word steal until trump started in with his stupidity

I guess you weren’t paying attention. The entire media seemed to pretend this was unprecedented and words like “stole”, “swayed”, “influenced”, “swung”, etc were all out there and being used daily. Here’s one or stole specifically

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ction-was-stolen-got-a-nicer-way-to-say-that/

 

[Vol8188]

If you want to

You’re avoiding the obvious question here. It’s weak.

There is no option to legally allow your baby to starve. If you do so you will go to jail. So we have established a way for people to surrender their child legally, that you eluded to.

If the ability to keep a fetus alive is there (for some abortions that ability is already here), should the child be allowed to simply die or should we establish a similar system?

 

[evillawyer]

Comedian vs Congresswoman?

Well, MTG is a comedian as well, even if not intentionally one.

 

[luthervol]

I thought you folks thought Trump was a monster, or a conman. Now you think he is a clown? Make up your minds.

Think Pennywise.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

You’re avoiding the obvious question here. It’s weak.

There is no option to legally allow your baby to starve. If you do so you will go to jail. So we have established a way for people to surrender their child legally, that you eluded to.

If the ability to keep a fetus alive is there (for some abortions that ability is already here), should the child be allowed to simply die or should we establish a similar system?

You don’t have to feed your baby because you can leave it at a fire station. So you have no such obligation

 

[Vol8188]

You don’t have to feed your baby because you can leave it at a fire station. So you have no such obligation

Obviously there’s an obligation. Taking the child to a fire station is an obligation.

Why would a similar obligation not apply to abortion? If the child is unwanted, but we can establish a system to save the child, why wouldn’t we?

Why do you only see that obligation as existing in one instance?

 

[clarksvol00]

Negative ghost rider. The states approved entry of new states.

Then I'd say the states need to approve the exit of another state.

Edit: I take that back. Looks like Congress admits new states. The Procedures for Adding States to the Union — Legislative Procedure

 

[Vol8188]

Then I'd say the states need to approve the exit of another state.

Edit: I take that back. Looks like Congress admits new states. The Procedures for Adding States to the Union — Legislative Procedure

If states can vote another state to stay in the union against their will, do you believe we should be able to vote states in against their will too?

I'd love to be able to hit up a few more places without a passport.

 

[clarksvol00]

If states can vote another state to stay in the union against their will, do you believe we should be able to vote states in against their will too?

I'd love to be able to hit up a few more places without a passport.

When has Congress added a state without its consent?

 

[Weezer]

If states can vote another state to stay in the union against their will, do you believe we should be able to vote states in against their will too?

I'd love to be able to hit up a few more places without a passport.

Have you not heard my plans for an American Empire that spans both Americas and Australia? And Japan, just for the hell of it.

 

[Vol8188]

When has Congress added a state without its consent?

They've also never said a state has to stay without their consent. Yet you believe they should be able, right?

 

[Vol8188]

Have you not heard my plans for an American Empire that spans both Americas and Australia? And Japan, just for the hell of it.

No, but I think I'm in.

 

[clarksvol00]

They've also never said a state has to stay without their consent. Yet you believe they should be able, right?

I do.

Edit: as to the bolded statement, I do believe there was some kind of dust-up about that a long time ago. It got pretty messy.

 

[OrangeBoro]

Damn... 17 pages in one day???

The left is obsesses with her, but it's more they want to ignore and distract from what is the epic failure of the biden/harris regime.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Obviously there’s an obligation. Taking the child to a fire station is an obligation.

Why would a similar obligation not apply to abortion? If the child is unwanted, but we can establish a system to save the child, why wouldn’t we?

Why do you only see that obligation as existing in one instance?

Because you are infringing upon the rights of the woman. At any other point, a woman can choose to not have her rights infringed upon further.

 

[Vol8188]

Because you are infringing upon the rights of the woman. At any other point, a woman can choose to not have her rights infringed upon further.

You’re ignoring the question still. Why is there not an obligation in this instance but there is an obligation in the other?

Edit: Because both are infringing upon the mother. Taking a child to the FD, no matter how low level, is still an obligation.

 

[n_huffhines]

I think you’re being a little over dramatic and are completely wrong.

What everyone fails to understand is we were basically set up Balkanized and it worked until NORTHERN politicians screwed it up.

Haha

 

[n_huffhines]

Negative ghost rider. The states approved entry of new states.

Pretty sure that's not what happened with West VA.

 

[hog88]

Pretty sure that's not what happened with West VA.

Yes, I was incorrect. Plus the formation of WVA is a whole other subject about the federal government ignoring the constitution.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

You’re ignoring the question still. Why is there not an obligation in this instance but there is an obligation in the other?

There is no obligation. Unless you want to compare the obligation to take a drug to induce labor with the obligation to travel to the fire station.