Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 37,975
- Likes
- 75,660
Mueller started in May '17 and finished April '19 - less than 2 years. Why add more than half a year?4 - 2.5 = 1.5
Why add 2 years?
What about the FBI investigation into Trump-Russia collusion led by Peter Strzok that supposedly started in July 2016?Mueller stated in May '17 and finished April '19 - less than 2 years. Why add more than half a year?
The Whitewater investigation actually ran about 8.5 years. March '92 to Sep. 2000.
You can manipulate the numbers any way you wish, but you always come out with Whitewater/Starr being far more than twice as lengthy.
I think that was a setup by Mueller. He probably notified members of Congress the moment he sent that letter. That being said, I don’t know that Barr mislead anyone because Mueller appears to be playing word games that leave him non-committal to any direction. He’s intentionally muddying the waters.
I'm not concerned at all about them. I will just always point out the lunacy when someone goes on about the length of the Mueller investigation. It was fast and professional; I don't know why everyone isn't happy about that.you all are so consumed with past investigations, you all have a very hard time staying on topic
The findings are in and it's over, anyone without a far left wing agenda has moved on. You all couldn't accept the 2016 election and now can't accept the results of the investigation.I'm not concerned at all about them. I will just always point out the lunacy when someone goes on about the length of the Mueller investigation. It was fast and professional; I don't know why everyone isn't happy about that.
Now we are in the process of reviewing the findings and deciding what action(s), if any, are warranted. That's actually the way it is supposed to work.
Mueller started in May '17 and finished April '19 - less than 2 years. Why add more than half a year?
The Whitewater investigation actually ran about 8.5 years. March '92 to Sep. 2000.
You can manipulate the numbers any way you wish, but you always come out with Whitewater/Starr being far more than twice as lengthy.
Of course you do, it's simply not possible that Trump or any of his associates could be remotely culpable of partisan fuqery. Only the 'dims'.
It's fascinating to watch you folks spin this, no one was holding a gun to Billy's head when he falsely answered Crist's question. That bed shtting belongs solely to Barr and now he's rightfully getting destroyed due to it.
Blaming Mueller for Billy's inability to discharge objective justice is about par for the course for you trump nuthuggers. Mueller handed Barr the noose and Barr and is so ****** awful at his job proceeded to put the thing around his own neck. Dude's a bigger clown than Donny. Mueller playing word games? I haven't heard from Mueller at all outside of his report. He certainly hasn't tried to mislead anyone with "his words", especially not the congressional judiciary committee.
What's wrong with looking closely at the report? What's wrong with congress asking to see the un-redacted version? What's wrong with questioning the AG's loyalties? What's wrong with hearing from Mueller?The findings are in and it's over, anyone without a far left wing agenda has moved on. You all couldn't accept the 2016 election and now can't accept the results of the investigation.