nuclearjunky
I’m to old for this
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 720
- Likes
- 1,076
Donald Trump warns presidency is being stolen amid Mueller angst - CNNPoliticsCan you point to the paranoia?
That constitutes paranoid to you, huh?Donald Trump warns presidency is being stolen amid Mueller angst - CNNPolitics
"Are they looking for a redo because they hated seeing the strong NO COLLUSION conclusion? There was no crime, except on the other side (incredibly not covered in the Report), and NO OBSTRUCTION. Bob Mueller should not testify. No redos for the Dems!"
The dems already do look foolish you all just don't realize it. I don't care what he has to say, I knew 2.5 years ago this is a hoax. You all would be wise to move onIf Mueller has nothing of substance to add, the dems. will look foolish.
If Mueller has something of substance to add, you should want to hear it.
If Mueller has nothing of substance to add, the dems. will look foolish.
If Mueller has something of substance to add, you should want to hear it.
They are taking a risk here, but they are willing to try anything to keep this steaming pile alive.What exactly do you think Bob is going do? If he says anything contradictory to his report then he exposes himself as a political hack? If he says anything that's not in his report then the next question is "Why wasn't this in the report"? I have a feeling that the Democrats are making a mistake here.
It does. It's the ramblings of a guilty man.
Then by all means, let them make the mistake.What exactly do you think Bob is going do? If he says anything contradictory to his report then he exposes himself as a political hack? If he says anything that's not in his report then the next question is "Why wasn't this in the report"? I have a feeling that the Democrats are making a mistake here.
Then by all means, let them make the mistake.
He may say something along the lines of, "it was made clear to me and so I operated under the assumption that a sitting president could not be indicted. The amount of evidence found indicating possible obstruction not only fails to exonerate the president but raises serious concerns. I felt Barr's 4 page memo and pre-release press conference completely distorted my position and mislead the public."
That last sentence is a liberal wet dream.Then by all means, let them make the mistake.
He may say something along the lines of, "it was made clear to me and so I operated under the assumption that a sitting president could not be indicted. The amount of evidence found indicating possible obstruction not only fails to exonerate the president but raises serious concerns. I felt Barr's 4 page memo and pre-release press conference completely distorted my position and mislead the public."
From the Post article about Mueller, Barr and the report:Then by all means, let them make the mistake.
He may say something along the lines of, "it was made clear to me and so I operated under the assumption that a sitting president could not be indicted. The amount of evidence found indicating possible obstruction not only fails to exonerate the president but raises serious concerns. I felt Barr's 4 page memo and pre-release press conference completely distorted my position and mislead the public."
"When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said."
LMAO! Knowing the Muell determined after 90 days there was no collusion but bilked it for two years wouldn’t be relevant information and knowledge?!At the end. Your questions always lack substance. Questions that don't further your knowledge is a stupid question. Your teachers probably rolled their eyes everytime you raised your hand.