Ok so this is easily solvable. Those federal funds amount to a federal contract. The recipient of those funds is subject to GAO review. If they play the “it’s classified” card the executive branch can squash that.
Blah blah. It’s another question in the poll. Where do you live. This is easy stop making silly excuses that it isn’t. It isn’t 50 instead of one. It’s a national poll they already do them.
Blah blah. It’s another question in the poll. Where do you live. This is easy stop making silly excuses that it isn’t. It isn’t 50 instead of one. It’s a national poll they already do them.
We’re not disagreeing on the poll vs EC split amount. We’re debating on whether they care about an accurate result to their poll based on how the outcome is determined vs whether the disconnect is worth more as a rallying cry to their agenda.
Documents that say Steele was wrong about where the Russians were signing checks to pay for the expansive and sweeping effort to influence the outcome of the election that has since been verified as true and was corroborated by other means at the time?
How about the good professor that was supposedly a Russian operative, meeting with Pappadopp, yet was actually a western intelligence operative there to try to entrap him? Or Mueller quoting a Russian business man in the report, about the existence and "flow" of damaging tapes? Yet now the guy quoted is petitioning that be struck from the report because Mueller stopped quoting mid-sentence and left out the part about the tapes not existing?
