FLVOL_79
My insider > Your insider
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 46,898
- Likes
- 68,865
Probably where the Russian collusion is...It's been two weeks. Where is it?
'Bombshell' report on James Comey coming in two weeks, Joe diGenova says
If the basis for the spying was paid opposition research, supplied by the Hillary campaign, leaked to the media in an effort to give the appearance of corroboration, and then lying about it all to the FISC......
Lord have mercy on them.
No different than one drug dealer snitching on another to avoid prison time or take out a competitor. Happens every day.
Trumpets have abandoned issues of ethics and morals. The argument only has merit if the act was illegal. That's the benchmark you’ve set in the era of Donald Trump.
It wasn’t illegal.
No, more like a typed memo from where Steele was interviewed prior to the FISA application indicating his dossier was full of lies. 10 days later the FBI “confirmed” that Steele’s info was solid.Documents that say Steele was wrong about where the Russians were signing checks to pay for the expansive and sweeping effort to influence the outcome of the election that has since been verified as true and was corroborated by other means at the time?
Maybe I’m missing how that’s a big deal. It seems like a valid basis for an investigation, to me. I think I’m glad we had the investigation because of what it uncovered about what the Russians were doing. Now if we can just get somebody in the government to try to fix it.
That’s not what your article says. Did you read it?No, more like a typed memo from where Steele was interviewed prior to the FISA application indicating his dossier was full of lies. 10 days later the FBI “confirmed” that Steele’s info was solid.
Maybe you missed this part. She said he isn’t credible and it was ignored or buried. Maybe you’ve missed the other stories about his info being a bunch of crap too.That’s not what your article says. Did you read it?
The hole noted in the memo was that he said they were paying for the misinformation campaign out of the consulate in Miami.
That fact likely is not relevant to obtaining a search warrant.
And that cuts both ways Rocky. My reference to the Russian female attorney that met with Glen Simpson immediately before and after the Trump Tower meeting is totally white washed out of the narrative and even the Mueller report best I can tell. It absolutely screams of setup and reference your own spy novel innuendo fits perfectly. So we have a Russian attorney coordinating with a UK national paid for by the opposing candidate and feeding data to the FBI. What the actual hell?!My only narrative is that watching the annihilation of truth is depressing and should be pushed back on, even if I’m just pissing into a hurricane.
Then Barr lied to Congress? That’s your implication?Or maybe this:
Barr has repeatedly said he does not object to Mueller testifying, and Trump has left the decision up to the attorney general — though the president voiced objection to Mueller’s public appearance over the weekend when he wrote on Twitter that the special counsel “should not testify.”
Maybe you missed this part. She said he isn’t credible and it was ignored or buried. Maybe you’ve missed the other stories about his info being a bunch of crap too.
“It is important to note that the FBI swore on Oct. 21, 2016, to the FISA judges that Steele's "reporting has been corroborated and used in criminal proceedings" and the FBI has determined him to be "reliable" and was "unaware of any derogatory information pertaining" to their informant, who simultaneously worked for Fusion GPS, the firm paid by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Clinton campaign to find Russian dirt on Trump.”
He said it’s key because 10 days later it was said Steele was reliable and his info had been corroborated. Maybe it was all a mistake but if that shoe were in the ther foot the Dems would be going nuts and you better believe it would be all over CNN and MSNBC.Went back and skimmed the oped again. Still don’t see it. What I see is exactly what I wrote. She said he was wrong about the money going through Miami, which Solomon calls a “key fact.” That might have been true if they had been applying for search warrants in Miami.
It’s yellow journalism.
Per the article:
“He will come at some point. If it’s necessary, we will subpoena him and he will come,” Nadler said later.
He said it’s key because 10 days later it was said Steele was reliable and his info had been corroborated.