Not relevant to the point being made. The point is you do not give a raise if there is no need to, Fulmer fulfills the "no need to" requirement.
However the powers that be must believe that Fulmer has performed well enough and will perform well enough in the future. The powers that be should have given a raise after these proposed successes happen, no need to until then. Just a dumb move.
Because they deserve it more than someone who isn't loyal and is just out for their own selfish interests. Again, how is he loyal? If you are truly loyal you don't need a raise to remain in place. You understand this concept of loyalty?
Do you know how to turn a loyal employee into a disloyal one? Treat employees that get what they want through threats better than you treat the loyal employee is a very good way to start. Just more nonsense.I do not care about their loyalty, I care how they perform.