New York City

New York City Is Shelling Out $8 Million Per Day To House Migrants

GettyImages-1448569089-scaled-e1683576311686.jpg


New York City is shelling out roughly $8 million a day to provide shelter for 37,500 migrants, officials said during a city council meeting Monday.

On average, the city is projected to spend an average of $256 to house each individual migrant per day in Department of Homeless Services shelters, Park said. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott began busing migrants to New York City in August and is expected to increase the transports following the end of Title 42, the Trump-era expulsion order. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Border Patrol Migrant Processing Centers Are Already Over Capacity Days Before Trump-Era Policy Ends)

New York City Is Shelling Out $8 Million Per Day To House Migrants

Guess NYC and other places thought illegal immigration was somebody else's problem when they opened their fat mouths to support illegals and impeded efforts to stop it. Guess they feel differently when it's suddenly their problem, too. Tough. Maybe NYC should have read the Martin Niemoller poem on what happens when people do nothing because "it's not my problem".
 
Tell that to the 1/6 "insurrectionists" sitting in jails.

Those in jail did more than make threats. They deserve to be in jail. One laughs at the conservatives who've tried to downplay a mob attack
on the U.S. Capitol that led to several deaths.

Imagine if a mob of blacks or lefty protestors attacked and broke into the Capitol. The MAGA people would lose their freakin' s-it. Nothing would more dramatically underscore their abject hypocrisy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
Those in jail did more than make threats. They deserve to be in jail. One laughs at the conservatives who've tried to downplay a mob attack
on the U.S. Capitol that led to several deaths.

Imagine if a mob of blacks or lefty protestors attacked and broke into the Capitol. The MAGA people would lose their freakin' s-it. Nothing would more dramatically underscore their abject hypocrisy.

There have been complete with pictures. You just can't find them now no matter how you search. You can try limiting the search but only the 1/6 stuff will show up. There are even pictures of lefty protestors interrupting proceedings and being forcibly removed, but just overwhelming everything with 1/6 is far more effective than scrubbing history - like hiding the old events in a 1/6 haystack of hits.
 
Those in jail did more than make threats. They deserve to be in jail. One laughs at the conservatives who've tried to downplay a mob attack
on the U.S. Capitol that led to several deaths.

Imagine if a mob of blacks or lefty protestors attacked and broke into the Capitol. The MAGA people would lose their freakin' s-it. Nothing would more dramatically underscore their abject hypocrisy.

Here you go. These are the Kavanaugh confirmation protests; guess you have to remember specific events that stirred up up lefties to find anything other than 1/6. There was one of protestors forcing barricades during the Kavanaugh hearings that looked eerily similar to 1/6. It looked legitimate because of Capitol construction, but I wasn't sure about it and didn't include it since I've noticed lefties don't tend to carry US flags.

GettyImages_1043778906.0.jpg

RTS246H8-1024x683.jpg

GettyImages_1039353720.jpg

This one is certainly ugly and disturbing enough, but for some reason senators weren't cowering in offices - apparently dems are agenda selective on when to go into hiding

KavanaughHearing_SS_090418_10.jpg
 
Here you go. These are the Kavanaugh confirmation protests; guess you have to remember specific events that stirred up up lefties to find anything other than 1/6. There was one of protestors forcing barricades during the Kavanaugh hearings that looked eerily similar to 1/6. It looked legitimate because of Capitol construction, but I wasn't sure about it and didn't include it since I've noticed lefties don't tend to carry US flags.

View attachment 550632

View attachment 550633

View attachment 550634

This one is certainly ugly and disturbing enough, but for some reason senators weren't cowering in offices - apparently dems are agenda selective on when to go into hiding

View attachment 550635

The Dregs of Society

GettyImages_1043778906.0.jpg
 
Those in jail did more than make threats. They deserve to be in jail. One laughs at the conservatives who've tried to downplay a mob attack
on the U.S. Capitol that led to several deaths.

Imagine if a mob of blacks or lefty protestors attacked and broke into the Capitol. The MAGA people would lose their freakin' s-it. Nothing would more dramatically underscore their abject hypocrisy.
Oh what Short and selective memories Libs have. Wisconsin Capitol protests by unhinged Libs. Not a single person went to jail
7CEB381E-DCA1-4E8B-B3B0-1219FC67FEC8.jpeg
 
NYC officials consider Central Park tents in last-minute bid to house migrants as crisis continues

City Hall officials hard-pressed to find living space for busloads of migrants arriving daily have asked New York City landmarks like the Flatiron Building and the Aqueduct Racetrack if they can provide space for the wave of new arrivals, according to a report.

Other possible venues under review: airplane hangars at John F. Kennedy Airport, tents in Central Park in Manhattan, Prospect Park in Brooklyn, and Flushing Meadows Corona parks in Queens, according to a report by CNN and confirmed by city officials.

NYPICHPDPICT000010624378-1.jpg

Migrants arriving at the former NYPD academy in Manhattan to spend the night on May 5, 2023.

NYPICHPDPICT000010638763-3.jpg


NYC officials consider Central Park tents to house migrants
 
NYC officials consider Central Park tents in last-minute bid to house migrants as crisis continues

City Hall officials hard-pressed to find living space for busloads of migrants arriving daily have asked New York City landmarks like the Flatiron Building and the Aqueduct Racetrack if they can provide space for the wave of new arrivals, according to a report.

Other possible venues under review: airplane hangars at John F. Kennedy Airport, tents in Central Park in Manhattan, Prospect Park in Brooklyn, and Flushing Meadows Corona parks in Queens, according to a report by CNN and confirmed by city officials.

NYPICHPDPICT000010624378-1.jpg

Migrants arriving at the former NYPD academy in Manhattan to spend the night on May 5, 2023.

NYPICHPDPICT000010638763-3.jpg


NYC officials consider Central Park tents to house migrants

Doesn't look like illegals are getting much for the $256/day to warehouse them. The graft, corruption, and union fees must be significant. Maybe the building should be renamed Tammany Hall. I'm good with it as long as the NY idiots who elected biden get to foot the bill and can't pass it along.
 
Doesn't look like illegals are getting much for the $256/day to warehouse them. The graft, corruption, and union fees must be significant. Maybe the building should be renamed Tammany Hall. I'm good with it as long as the NY idiots who elected biden get to foot the bill and can't pass it along.

I thought that occupancy of New York office space was in dire straights. I guess using empty office space is a non-starter.
 
NYC Mayor Eric Adams Plans an Executive Order to BYPASS parts of decades-old law which says the city will give a Bed to anyone who asks for it - a day before Title 42 is set to end

The mayor of New York City is planning to override parts of the 40-year-old 'Right to Shelter' law guaranteeing a bed for anyone who needs it, as the city braces for an expected influx of migrants when Title 42 is lifted on Thursday.

Eric Adams and his team are scrambling for solutions, with 61,000 migrants having arrived in the city in the last year.

Thursday's lifting of the pandemic-era border control policy is likely to see yet more arrivals, and New York is struggling to house the newcomers. On Monday, heads of city agencies were asked to provide a list of potential shelters: among the suggestions were the Flatiron Building, tents in Central Park, and hangars at JFK airport.

On Wednesday, a homeless advocacy group said they had been told the 'Right to Shelter' law, enacted in 1981, would be partially overruled, via executive order.

NYC mayor plans to BYPASS decades-old law which says city will give a bed to anyone who asks for it | Daily Mail Online
 
NYC Mayor Eric Adams Plans an Executive Order to BYPASS parts of decades-old law which says the city will give a Bed to anyone who asks for it - a day before Title 42 is set to end

The mayor of New York City is planning to override parts of the 40-year-old 'Right to Shelter' law guaranteeing a bed for anyone who needs it, as the city braces for an expected influx of migrants when Title 42 is lifted on Thursday.

Eric Adams and his team are scrambling for solutions, with 61,000 migrants having arrived in the city in the last year.

Thursday's lifting of the pandemic-era border control policy is likely to see yet more arrivals, and New York is struggling to house the newcomers. On Monday, heads of city agencies were asked to provide a list of potential shelters: among the suggestions were the Flatiron Building, tents in Central Park, and hangars at JFK airport.

On Wednesday, a homeless advocacy group said they had been told the 'Right to Shelter' law, enacted in 1981, would be partially overruled, via executive order.

NYC mayor plans to BYPASS decades-old law which says city will give a bed to anyone who asks for it | Daily Mail Online

Where is the liberal compassion?
 
This guy should have fled the Country as soon as NYC started protesting.




I don't know enough about what led up to it, just general descriptions. But the family complaining bothers me because they knew he was significantly mentally ill and they didn't take care of him. Suddenly they are insisting others should have had more compassion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volgr and AM64
I don't know enough about what led up to it, just general descriptions. But the family complaining bothers me because they knew he was significantly mentally ill and they didn't take care of him. Suddenly they are insisting others should have had more compassion.


That’s because you didn’t bother to look. There’s plenty of detailed accounts of what led up to the event.

 
That’s because you didn’t bother to look. There’s plenty of detailed accounts of what led up to the event.




You misunderstood. I'm not criticism the guy that did the hold. I'm saying I don't know enough to have a strong opinion. I'm just critical of all the people who could have helped the guy long ago who are now piling on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and AM64
I don't know enough about what led up to it, just general descriptions. But the family complaining bothers me because they knew he was significantly mentally ill and they didn't take care of him. Suddenly they are insisting others should have had more compassion.

Their first clue should have been that he had been arrested 42 times, which means he probably committed 10 times that many crimes.
 
I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone go from zero to “well he deserved to die” upon hearing about priors quicker than @VolStrom does lol. Perfect Fox News target audience
 
I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone go from zero to “well he deserved to die” upon hearing about priors quicker than @VolStrom does lol. Perfect Fox News target audience

I doubt anyone would say he deserved to die, but dying while being restrained after threatening passengers? Sucks, wish he hadnt died from being restrained but I also am not going to prosecute the guy who restrained him.
 
I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone go from zero to “well he deserved to die” upon hearing about priors quicker than @VolStrom does lol. Perfect Fox News target audience

Some of you are too quick to incorrectly consider what others are saying. Both @VolStrom and LG pointed out that the "victim's" history called for some sort of treatment rather than just being put back into circulation as a public nuisance. Eventually the guy was bound to run into a wrong person or a wrong time and when it happened the finger should rightfully be pointing at his family and a "social" system that failed him rather solely at a guy who attempted to restrain him.
 
Some of you are too quick to incorrectly consider what others are saying. Both @VolStrom and LG pointed out that the "victim's" history called for some sort of treatment rather than just being put back into circulation as a public nuisance. Eventually the guy was bound to run into a wrong person or a wrong time and when it happened the finger should rightfully be pointing at his family and a "social" system that failed him rather solely at a guy who attempted to restrain him.

VolStrom literally said killing him was okay because he hypothetically might harm someone else, maybe read the entire thread before talking about “incorrectly” thx
 

VN Store



Back
Top