New York City

Police also said the threats weren’t directed at anyone in particular, and given that I’ve seen plenty of homeless people yelling on subways I’m inclined to agree with them. I’d maybe relax on the “full of sh**” narrative given what’s left of your argument and given that our interactions started with you being full of sh** about me “twisting perception”, but you seem very stubborn

Once again avoided answering the question. Did he threaten to kill other passengers? Because you claimed I was making that up, so which is it?
 
Once again avoided answering the question. Did he threaten to kill other passengers? Because you claimed I was making that up, so which is it?

He said “I’ll kill a mf” and police said it wasn’t directed at other passengers, which would be a no lol. But either way I take back saying that you were making it up. I did at least start off saying I hadn’t seen it anywhere, which isn’t crazy or a lie
 
He said “I’ll kill a mf” and police said it wasn’t directed at other passengers, which would be a no lol. But either way I take back saying that you were making it up. I did at least start off saying I hadn’t seen it anywhere, which isn’t crazy or a lie

Proud of you little guy, you finally admitted you were talking out of your a** 👍
Class dismissed
 
My current theory is to do all I can to ever avoid setting foot in one of the deep blue leftist hellholes known as America’s big cities. The odds are heavily stacked against you. First there is the danger from crime itself (plus disease from the feces and needle infested sidewalks of some cities). Then the fact that you are prohibited from carrying the means to defend yourself from career criminals who have been released dozens of times already. Third, if you DO take steps to defend yourself, YOU will be the one prosecuted, especially if the right cry baby camp starts “peacefully protesting”. Unless your job requires it; just don’t physically go there. Definitely don’t invest or spend your hard earned dollars there. The voters have chosen the ninth circle of Hell of their own volition. Leave them to it
 
Proud of you little guy, you finally admitted you were talking out of your a** 👍
Class dismissed

Our entire conversation was based on you talking out of your a** about my post being “inaccurate,” you just triple down on douche instead of admitting when you’re wrong lol
 
My current theory is to do all I can to ever avoid setting foot in one of the deep blue leftist hellholes known as America’s big cities. The odds are heavily stacked against you. First there is the danger from crime itself (plus disease from the feces and needle infested sidewalks of some cities). Then the fact that you are prohibited from carrying the means to defend yourself from career criminals who have been released dozens of times already. Third, if you DO take steps to defend yourself, YOU will be the one prosecuted, especially if the right cry baby camp starts “peacefully protesting”. Unless your job requires it; just don’t physically go there. Definitely don’t invest or spend your hard earned dollars there. The voters have chosen the ninth circle of Hell of their own volition. Leave them to it

As someone who has lived in NYC for years it’s cute to read tough gun owners talking about how “the odds are stacked against you” surviving here for like a 4-day vacation lol. You’ll be fine
 
  • Like
Reactions: C/O
Bottom line on NYC subway case. Mentally ill man who received constant enabling from the city instead of the treatment he so desperately needed kept basically playing Russian Roulette with his own life. He finally pulled the trigger on a cylinder that had a live round in it. Tragic but not criminal (well maybe criminal negligence from the city that kept putting him back in harms way 40+ times)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Our entire conversation was based on you talking out of your a** about my post being “inaccurate,” you just can’t admit when you’re wrong lol

I don’t have to admit I was wrong about anything because I never spoke out of my a** like you did. Look up a few posts and you’ll see yourself backtracking off your previous comments and having to “take it back”. Hope you learned a valuable lesson, but based on your other posts I’ve seen I doubt it lmao
 
As someone who has lived in NYC for years it’s cute to read tough gun owners talking about how “the odds are stacked against you” surviving here for like a 4-day vacation lol. You’ll be fine
Keep living there then. Your number is in the hopper
98AF70A7-39B9-4131-864A-F046169AEE63.gif
 
I don’t have to admit I was wrong about anything because I never spoke out of my a** like you did. Look up a few posts and you’ll see yourself backtracking off your previous comments and having to “take it back”. Hope you learned a valuable lesson, but based on your other posts I’ve seen I doubt it lmao

“That’s inaccurate” and “why are you trying to twist perception” were both wrong and directly out of your a** and would have saved us all of this discussion, and you’ve seen them, but again you seem very stubborn
 
If you think a homeless man yelling on a NYC subway is violence then I guess you thought wrong? Just sounds like you’ve never been here
Nope just pointing out how the left is 💯 incapable of being intellectually consistent with an argument (in this case, the definition of violence).
Been to NYC for a total of about 14 days throughout my adult life. Good food and museums and theater. Otherwise loud, overpriced, crowded, rude, and smelly. No plans to go back save transiting through the airport or train station.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Nope just pointing out how the left is 💯 incapable of being intellectually consistent with an argument (in this case, the definition of violence).
Been to NYC for a total of about 14 days throughout my adult life. Good food and museums and theater. Otherwise loud, overpriced, crowded, rude, and smelly. No plans to go back save transiting through the airport or train station.

That’s not necessarily inconsistent if there are certain “fighting words” that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (which there are)
 
That’s not necessarily inconsistent if there are certain “fighting words” that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (which there are)
So which is it? Was the recently deceased violent (based on fighting words) and therefore justifiably subject to extreme restraint or was he merely a maltreated harmless Michael Jackson impersonator ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and 82_VOL_83
So which is it? Was the recently deceased violent (based on fighting words) and therefore justifiably subject to extreme restraint or was he merely a maltreated harmless Michael Jackson impersonator ?

Nothing he said would qualify as fighting words, so if it’s one of the above it would have to be the latter
 
Nothing he said would qualify as fighting words, so if it’s one of the above it would have to be the latter
So what did he look like? Was he the little young Michael Jackson impersonator from 12 years ago his family likes to portray, or a hardened drug addict that looked like a grown ass man with a beard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
So what did he look like? Was he the little young Michael Jackson impersonator from 12 years ago his family likes to portray, or a hardened drug addict that looked like a grown ass man with a beard?

He looks however he looks in the many videos posted everywhere of him, I can’t wait to see how you attempt to make this relevant
 

VN Store



Back
Top