New York City

[615vols]

VolStrom literally said killing him was okay because he hypothetically might harm someone else, maybe read the entire thread before talking about “incorrectly” thx

Remember when i told you passengers were quoted as saying neely was threatening to kill them and you said it was untrue, kept insinuating it didn’t happen? From the ny post interview with a passenger on the subway train: “He said, ‘I don’t care. I’ll take a bullet, I’ll go to jail’ because he would kill people on the train,” the woman said of Neely. “He said, ‘I would kill a motherf—er. I don’t care. I’ll take a bullet. I’ll go to jail.’”
Imagine that, nashvol wrong again. Who else is shocked

 

[NashVol11]

Remember when i told you passengers were quoted as saying neely was threatening to kill them and you said it was untrue, kept insinuating it didn’t happen? From the ny post interview with a passenger on the subway train: “He said, ‘I don’t care. I’ll take a bullet, I’ll go to jail’ because he would kill people on the train,” the woman said of Neely. “He said, ‘I would kill a motherf—er. I don’t care. I’ll take a bullet. I’ll go to jail.’”
Imagine that, nashvol wrong again. Who else is shocked

Remember when I said he didn’t inflict violence on everyone and you quoted me what, 30 times now? With a grand total of zero examples let the adults talk thx, you’ve wasted enough of our time saying nothing

 

[ETV]

Here you go. These are the Kavanaugh confirmation protests; guess you have to remember specific events that stirred up up lefties to find anything other than 1/6. There was one of protestors forcing barricades during the Kavanaugh hearings that looked eerily similar to 1/6. It looked legitimate because of Capitol construction, but I wasn't sure about it and didn't include it since I've noticed lefties don't tend to carry US flags.

View attachment 550632

View attachment 550633

View attachment 550634

This one is certainly ugly and disturbing enough, but for some reason senators weren't cowering in offices - apparently dems are agenda selective on when to go into hiding

View attachment 550635

Another case of mostly peaceful protests.

 

[615vols]

Remember when I said he didn’t inflict violence on everyone and you quoted me what, 30 times now? With a grand total of zero examples let the adults talk thx, you’ve wasted enough of our time saying nothing

A lot of words to avoid admitting you were full of sh**, as usual.

 

[NashVol11]

A lot of words to avoid admitting you were full of sh**, as usual.

Lmao this is our conversation:

Nash: he wasn’t inflicting violence on anyone
615: LIAR!!!! He was threatening them! Was he or wasn’t he? He was threatening them!
Nash: so he wasn’t inflicting violence on anyone
615: Well, no, he wasn’t

Spread out over 30 posts of you saying nothing beyond that, plus a bunch of emojis

 

[615vols]

Lmao this is our conversation:

Nash: he wasn’t inflicting violence on anyone
615: LIAR!!!! He was threatening them! Was he or wasn’t he? He was threatening them!
Nash: so he wasn’t inflicting violence on anyone
615: Well, no, he wasn’t

Spread out over 30 posts of you saying nothing beyond that, plus a bunch of emojis

Here’s one of several posts by you saying Neely making death threats wasn’t true:

 

[AM64]

VolStrom literally said killing him was okay because he hypothetically might harm someone else, maybe read the entire thread before talking about “incorrectly” thx

Don't see any way you could get that message from this:

"Their first clue should have been that he had been arrested 42 times, which means he probably committed 10 times that many crimes. "

And in looking back a few more pages I still couldn't find any @VolStrom quotes suggesting that killing someone was appropriate.

 

[ETV]

It's better to be proactive and not reactive.

You can not wait until threats are followed through with, while you sit idle and watch it unfold. One can't assume Mr. Neely wasn't armed and only acting out verbally, without intention to carry out threats.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Homeless Veterans are being kicked out of New York hotels to make room for Illegal Aliens.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

I disagree. You can't just claim "I thought he was armed" to justify killing someone.

Sure you can!

 

[NashVol11]

Don't see any way you could get that message from this:

"Their first clue should have been that he had been arrested 42 times, which means he probably committed 10 times that many crimes. "

And in looking back a few more pages I still couldn't find any @VolStrom quotes suggesting that killing someone was appropriate.

Tell me more. Also had another post about the killer “deserving a medal” but that’s further back

Here's a hypothetical for you. What if nobody said or did a thing to the crazy guy, and he pulls a knife out and stabs 3 or 4 people to death? I'm sure you'd be singing the blues about how NYC failed and allowed others to die.

Got it. So killing someone because they might do something is okay.

In my book it is. He was arrested over 40 times, he should have been in prison.

 

[NashVol11]

Here’s one of several posts by you saying Neely making death threats wasn’t true:
View attachment 551223

Another post for the bolded points below lol, good times

Lmao this is our conversation:

Nash: he wasn’t inflicting violence on anyone
615: LIAR!!!! He was threatening them! Was he or wasn’t he? He was threatening them!
Nash: so he wasn’t inflicting violence on anyone
615: Well, no, he wasn’t

Spread out over 30 posts of you saying nothing beyond that, plus a bunch of emojis

 

[615vols]

Another post for the bolded points below lol, good times

More dancing and deflecting to save face lol

 

[NashVol11]

More dancing and deflecting to save face lol

You’re the one who can’t stay on topic lol, just not smart enough to realize it. You’re arguing an irrelevant point because you’ve been wrong the whole time about violence, hope that helps this sink in finally

 

[615vols]

You’re arguing an irrelevant point because you’ve been wrong the whole time about violence, hope that helps this sink in finally

Nope. When I referenced him threatening to kill the passengers, you said I was making it up. You said it didn’t happen. Now there’s quotes provided from passengers which literally say he threatened to kill them, and you’re trying to deflect and make a different argument. You were full of sh** and got called on it. Now keep dancing for me boy

 

[NashVol11]

Nope. When I referenced him threatening to kill the passengers, you said I was making it up. You said it didn’t happen. Now there’s quotes provided from passengers which literally say he threatened to kill them, and you’re trying to deflect and make a different argument. You were full of sh** and got called on it. Now keep dancing for me boy

And we are talking about threats because you claimed he was doing something violent, then backed off of that in zero seconds and spouting nonsense ever since

 

[615vols]

And we are talking about threats because you claimed he was doing something violent, then backed off of that in zero seconds and spouting nonsense ever since

Show me the post where I said Neely was doing something violent. I want to see what you are referencing.

 

[NashVol11]

Show me the post where I said Neely was doing something violent. I want to see what you are referencing.

“This isn’t entirely accurate” + “twist perception” just to not disagree with anything I said

This isn’t entirely accurate. I’ve seen several witness interviews stating that the man was shouting about not being afraid to go back to prison for life, taking his jacket off, and then screaming he was going to kill/harm the people on the subway. One of the witnesses I watched said everyone was definitely scared, hence why one guy put him in a chokehold and the other two helped hold him down. Why are you trying to twist the perception of the event?

 

[615vols]

“This isn’t entirely accurate” + “twist perception” just to not disagree with anything I said

Nope, Try again. You just said I “claimed he was doing something violent”. What you just quoted does not say he was doing something violent. Nashvol getting caught full of sh** again, anyone surprised? Lmao

 

[NashVol11]

Nope, Try again. You just said I “claimed he was doing something violent”. What you just quoted does not say he was doing something violent. Nashvol getting caught full of sh** again, anyone surprised? Lmao

Trying too hard to fight over something. I said he wasn’t doing anything violent and you called that inaccurate and said I was trying to twist things. That was all wrong, all this arguing is a waste of time because that was wrong, and now you want to argue “claim” vs “call you a liar when you say otherwise”? Be serious

 

[615vols]

Trying too hard to fight over something. I said he wasn’t doing anything violent and you called that inaccurate and said I was trying to twist things. That was all wrong, all this arguing is a waste of time because that was wrong, and now you want to argue “claim” vs “call you a liar when you say otherwise”? Be serious

I am being serious. Your exact words were “you claimed he was doing something violent”. Now when I ask you to prove it and show me where I said Neely did something violent, you can’t. You are a waste of time because you are constantly full of sh**. When I said Neely was threatening to kill passengers, you said I was making it up. Now direct quotes from passengers on the subway have been provided from The NY Times saying neely was indeed threatening to kill people. Wrong about that, wrong about me saying Neely was being violent, wrong on everything.

 

[NashVol11]

I am being serious. Your exact words were “you claimed he was doing something violent”. Now when I ask you to prove it and show me where I said Neely did something violent, you can’t. You are a waste of time because you are constantly full of sh**. When I said Neely was threatening to kill passengers, you said I was making it up. Now direct quotes from passengers on the subway have been provided from The NY Times saying neely was indeed threatening to kill people. Wrong about that, wrong about me saying Neely was being violent, wrong on everything.

Saying with a straight face “I never SAID he was being violent, I called you a liar because YOU said he wasn’t” is not being serious lol.

You said my post was inaccurate and twisting perception and now have written probably 10K words without backing that up, let’s see if you own up to that or quadruple down

 

[615vols]

Saying with a straight face “I never SAID he was being violent, I called you a liar because YOU said he wasn’t” is not being serious lol.

You said my post was inaccurate and twisting perception and now have written probably 10K words without backing that up, let’s see if you own up to that or quadruple down

Read through the conversation again, perhaps slower. You kept saying things like “he was just screaming for food”, you wouldn’t acknowledge the fact that he was threatening the other passengers with violence and saying he was about to start killing people. That’s why I said you were not being entirely accurate. Amazing that you’re having such a hard time understanding this. In fact you said I was making it up when I said he was threatening to kill people. You’ve made multiple false claims and when asked to provide proof all I’ve gotten is 40 posts of you saying a whole bunch of nothing to avoid your bullsh** being called out. You stand by your statement that I was making up the threats of killing passengers? You ever gonna show where I said Neely did something violent? Not looking likely lmao..

 

[NashVol11]

I am being serious. Your exact words were “you claimed he was doing something violent”. Now when I ask you to prove it and show me where I said Neely did something violent, you can’t. You are a waste of time because you are constantly full of sh**. When I said Neely was threatening to kill passengers, you said I was making it up. Now direct quotes from passengers on the subway have been provided from The NY Times saying neely was indeed threatening to kill people. Wrong about that, wrong about me saying Neely was being violent, wrong on everything.

Police also said the threats weren’t directed at anyone in particular, and given that I’ve seen plenty of homeless people yelling on subways I’m inclined to agree with them. I’d maybe relax on the “full of sh**” narrative given what’s left of your argument and given that our interactions started with you being full of sh** about me “twisting perception”, but you seem very stubborn

 

[NashVol11]

Read through the conversation again, perhaps slower. You kept saying things like “he was just screaming for food”, you wouldn’t acknowledge the fact that he was threatening the other passengers with violence and saying he was about to start killing people. That’s why I said you were not being entirely accurate. Amazing that you’re having such a hard time understanding this. In fact you said I was making it up when I said he was threatening to kill people. You’ve made multiple false claims and when asked to provide proof all I’ve gotten is 40 posts of you saying a whole bunch of nothing to avoid your bullsh** being called out. You stand by your statement that I was making up the threats of killing passengers? You ever gonna show where I said Neely did something violent? Not looking likely lmao..

Okay, the bold is a straight up lie. You quoted the post you were responding to and said “that’s not entirely accurate,” and now are trying to revise to say you “obviously” were talking about a collection of posts. No one here is this stupid.

Since you’ll just make things up instead of admit when you’re wrong, we can just agree that the post you initially quoted did NOT include anything accurate (contrary to what you said) and leave it at that. We should be on the same page there.