Nick Stephens

[utgibbs]

Fulmer's firing had no bearing on the 2 passes Gingy threw to Wyoming.

Of course it did. There was a lack of team focus.

 

[kptvol]

But you fired him to improve on that. You haven't done it.

It's been one year. You can't be serious.

 

[crusse10]

your idol only won 2 in 17yrs. Who would be our HC in this magical fantasy decade?



in Knoxville? No you don't

My guess is who he thinks is our 2nd best coach ever, Neyland.

 

[kptvol]

Of course it did. There was a lack of team focus.

Apparently not on the defensive end of the ball. What caused the "lack of team focus" for the offense for the other 11 games that season?

 

[utgibbs]

I've seen mediocrity face to face and his name is Phillip Fulmer.

Sorry, crusse. I respect your knowledge and you are a good debater, but I have to call experience on you here.

You simply do not know what mediocre at TN means.

Unless you are a mature student. Then, welcome to your opinion, and I would ask how on earth the 2000s compare with the 1970s.

I will say this, 2005 was perhaps the most disappointing season between expectations and where we ended up. Even over the 1970's and early 80's.

 

[crusse10]

Of course it did. There was a lack of team focus.

Wow. Did he have that lack of focus earlier in the season. If that's the case, sounds like he had bad coaching all year...

 

[EricFreakingBerry]

Who cares about Nick Stephens? We have Nicholas Stephenson.

 

[doozer]

whose alias is utgibbs?

no way anybody is this stupid.

 

[utvolpj]

Wow. Did he have that lack of focus earlier in the season. If that's the case, sounds like he had bad coaching all year...

in before "vapor-lock NFL QB" reference (I believe that's F5 in gibbs keyboard)

 

[crusse10]

Sorry, crusse. I respect your knowledge and you are a good debater, but I have to call experience on you here.

You simply do not know what mediocre at TN means.

Unless you are a mature student. Then, welcome to your opinion, and I would ask how on earth the 2000s compare with the 1970s.

I will say this, 2005 was perhaps the most disappointing season between expectations and where we ended up. Even over the 1970's and early 80's.

I'd put the late 2000s against any other decade for mediocrity. We were losing games we should win, getting crushed in games that should be close, and accepting it all because we hadn't seen the film yet.

 

[crusse10]

Who cares about Nick Stephens? We have Nicholas Stephenson.

He's a kicker, though. Apples to oranges.

 

[utgibbs]

your idol only won 2 in 17yrs. Who would be our HC in this magical fantasy decade?



in Knoxville? No you don't

It could be Phil, it could be another coach who consistently gets Tennessee into the SECCG. As I've said, it is important to get to the SECCG consistently. Every three years will be hard to beat.

Who said Knoxville? TN's fifth largest city though. Intellectual honesty, utvolpj. Put it into practice.

 

[utgibbs]

in before "vapor-lock NFL QB" reference (I believe that's F5 in gibbs keyboard)

Facts are facts:

J. Crompton 8 98.13 86-167-5 51.5 889 4 63 111.1
Nick Stephens 7 108.28 63-130-3 48.5 840 4 60 120.0

The future NFL QB couldn't get separation on the starter at Chainsaw Massacre State.

You get a GSM, and a clear demonstration of data driven debate!

 

[kptvol]

Then, welcome to your opinion, and I would ask how on earth the 2000s compare with the 1970s.

I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions:

1970-1979
W: 75
L: 39
T: 3
Winning Pct: 64%
Bowl Record: 4-2
SEC Champs: 1979

2000-2009
W: 83
L: 44
Winning Pct: 65%
Bowl Record: 3-6
SEC Champs: N/A

 

[crusse10]

It could be Phil, it could be another coach who consistently gets Tennessee into the SECCG. As I've said, it is important to get to the SECCG consistently. Every three years will be hard to beat.

Who said Knoxville? TN's fifth largest city though. Intellectual honesty, utvolpj. Put it into practice.

If it seems like Florida's there an awful lot, it's because they've been there 10/18 times. I wonder if their good coaching has something to do with it. I mean...They rarely had a problem beating us

 

[crusse10]

I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions:

1970-1979
W: 75
L: 39
T: 3
Winning Pct: 64%
Bowl Record: 4-2
SEC Champs: 1979

2000-2009
W: 83
L: 44
Winning Pct: 65%
Bowl Record: 3-6
SEC Champs: N/A

Stats are only relevant when he brings them up. Thanks for playing, though.

 

[crusse10]

Facts are facts:

J. Crompton 8 98.13 86-167-5 51.5 889 4 63 111.1
Nick Stephens 7 108.28 63-130-3 48.5 840 4 60 120.0

The future NFL QB couldn't get separation on the starter at Chainsaw Massacre State.

You get a GSM, and a clear demonstration of data driven debate!

The irony of that being said right before you get statistically owned is sweeeeeeeeeet

 

[utvolpj]

The irony of that being said right before you get statistically owned is sweeeeeeeeeet

real trolls never let facts get in the way. He successfully turned this into a Fulmer debate rather than a discussion about Nick. He wins and we're all dumber for it

 

[EricFreakingBerry]

He's a kicker, though. Apples to oranges.

Disagree, when you can kick 89 yard field goals right down the middle you don't worry about mediocre QBs.

 

[EricFreakingBerry]

I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions:

1970-1979
W: 75
L: 39
T: 3
Winning Pct: 64%
Bowl Record: 4-2
SEC Champs: 1979

2000-2009
W: 83
L: 44
Winning Pct: 65%
Bowl Record: 3-6
SEC Champs: N/A

I'd rather have the 1%!

:crazy:

 

[utgibbs]

I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions:

1970-1979
W: 75
L: 39
T: 3
Winning Pct: 64%
Bowl Record: 4-2
SEC Champs: 1979

2000-2009
W: 83
L: 44
Winning Pct: 65%
Bowl Record: 3-6
SEC Champs: N/A

You think we won the SEC in 1979??????????? lol: It's the only time I can remember losing to BOTH Mississippi schools!

As I have said, you don't remember the 1970's.

crusse, I'm disappointed. You don't have to be corrupted by the GoF.

1973 - 4 losses (one a bowl loss)
1974 - 3 losses (2 ties, including Vandy)
1975 - 5 losses (North Texas among them)
1976 - 5 losses
1977 - 7 losses
1978 - 5 losses (5 wins, 1 tie)
1979 - 5 losses

I'm already at 34 losses, KPT. And given GoF logic, a TIE in the old money is definitely a LOSS.

Wipe your noses, juniors. You deserve this humiliation.

 

[utgibbs]

The irony of that being said right before you get statistically owned is sweeeeeeeeeet

See above, crusse. It's disappointing you fall to GoF level sometimes. Again, make sure your DATA makes sense.

Use this as a lesson. Sometimes when we are broken, we grow stronger in the broken places.....

 

[utgibbs]

real trolls never let facts get in the way. He successfully turned this into a Fulmer debate rather than a discussion about Nick. He wins and we're all dumber for it

Fail.

But, I didn't expect more from you, to be honest.

 

[kptvol]

You think we won the SEC in 1979??????????? lol: It's the only time I can remember losing to BOTH Mississippi schools!

As I have said, you don't remember the 1970's.

crusse, I'm disappointed. You don't have to be corrupted by the GoF.

1973 - 4 losses (one a bowl loss)
1974 - 3 losses (2 ties, including Vandy)
1975 - 5 losses (North Texas among them)
1976 - 5 losses
1977 - 7 losses
1978 - 5 losses (5 wins, 1 tie)
1979 - 5 losses

I'm already at 34 losses, KPT. And given GoF logic, a TIE in the old money is definitely a LOSS.

Wipe your noses, juniors. You deserve this humiliation.

Uh? What? I didn't include ties in the winning percentage, thus, they did count as losses. Why did avoid counting the three best years of the 70s? Should we subtract 2001 from Fulmer?

1970 - 2 losses
1971 - 2 losses
1972 - 1 loss
34 + 5 = 39

75/(75+39+3) = 0.64

http://www.utsports.com/fans/sec.html

Thanks, junior.

 

[utvolpj]

Fail.

But, I didn't expect more from you, to be honest.

actually it's spot on. You seem to have no real grasp of reality and your fantasy of "remembering the 70's" is pretty funny. You're at least consistent but that's not always a good thing