VolunteerHillbilly
Spike Drinks, Not Trees
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 40,772
- Likes
- 15,162
Okay, I'll answer it this way. Some time back, I was talking to one of my clients that made mention Butch was on the hotseat and we would be starting a search. They also mentioned how she heard UT was going big. I asked specifically if they thought it was Gruden. The response?
"Everyone wants Gruden."
If Gruden isn't in the top 5 or 3 of Fulmer, we are completely screwed. Fulmer is smart, has to realize what this fan base wants, craves even and knows what a name like Gruden will do to the masses as well as the national level media attention it's going to bring.
Does that answer your question about "other coaches" over Gruden?
BS. I asked a legit question that has yet to be answered but only flamed. I have a family. I have a dog. I can get plenty of attention elsewhere. I cant take a poo without my dog whining at the door.
Again, I just see Fulmer as wanting a Petersen, Frost, Fuente, type hire. Maybe even les. I just dont see the G name riling Fulmer up like it does people on here. I could be way off.
Come on man. Think a little. Gruden aside, MIT knew nothing more than any of us. The second it looked like the Gruden thing wasnt working he started the I was just pushing a positive agenda. I hope Gruden comes, but all that aside MIT knows as much about a coach as I do walking on the moon.
Yes it is because if true, it would give other boosters more confidence in keeping the pressure on the Haslams without reservation