You don't have to be a douche bag. We can just talk about differences of opinion politely and you can clarify your points without calling me names.
I find your position pretty interesting. Most Rs would argue the opposite is true. You got GV and others saying we had to take out Saddam because he was a bad actor. I side with you moreso than them.
I say leave it all alone, but when you say "if it serves our best interest" to directly back them, I can't argue with that because it's a statement that supports itself by implying positive outcome. My position is that it doesn't serve our best interest to directly back them. We're best off if we just stay the hell out. I don't think new events change that. It's never going to be resolved with our involvement. You can't defeat terrorism, because it's not a country, it's a movement and/or tactic.