Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

That is not true.

Under 15 a of the affidavit, it is said that DePape broke into the home for the purpose of kidnapping Nancy Pelosi and breaking her kneecaps. There was also a stated reason given. It was that Nancy Pelosi was the leader of the pack of lies in the Democratic Party.


Plus his social media is election denier crap and pro 1/6 attack on the Capitol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
That is not true.

Under 15 a of the affidavit, it is said that DePape broke into the home for the purpose of kidnapping Nancy Pelosi and breaking her kneecaps. There was also a stated reason given. It was that Nancy Pelosi was the leader of the pack of lies in the Democratic Party.
yes it’s 100% true he makes no direct statement what his political affiliation is nor does he even imply what they are you’re just trying your usual stretch sales job. His only clear statement is he is angry at Nancy.

The only direct statements indicating political affiliation come from his ex which again state A) she has always been progressive and B) his views aligned with hers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
yes it’s 100% true he makes no direct statement what his political affiliation is nor does he even imply what they are you’re just trying your usual stretch sales job. His only clear statement is he is angry at Nancy.

The only direct statements indicating political affiliation come from his ex which again state A) she has always been progressive and B) his views aligned with hers.
Wrong.

DePape provided the police with a political motivation for his violent actions. It's just not what you want to hear. DePape targeted Nancy Pelosi due to her leadership standing in the Democratic Party, and his belief that Democrats are liars.

I'm sorry that reading comprehension is such a challenge for you.
 
yes it’s 100% true he makes no direct statement what his political affiliation is nor does he even imply what they are you’re just trying your usual stretch sales job. His only clear statement is he is angry at Nancy.

The only direct statements indicating political affiliation come from his ex which again state A) she has always been progressive and B) his views aligned with hers.
Amazing, his only political affiliation on record is as a Green Party supporter.
 
Wrong.

DePape provided the police with a political motivation for his violent actions. It's just not what you want to hear. DePape targeted Nancy Pelosi due to her leadership standing in the Democratic Party, and his belief that Democrats are liars.

I'm sorry that reading comprehension is such a challenge for you.
Is he wrong? Are they/she not liars?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
One thing he did that still impresses me to this day. All these rich well educated politicians go to Iowa every election cycle. They put on some plaid shirt their assistant bought for them. Add a twang to their voice like Brian Kelly with his FAAAmily comment. And turn into something they are not for votes.

Trump shows up in a suit!

Now that doesn’t make someone a great POTUS or a great person, but give me more of that than this constant pandering I see all the damn time.
Trump has done more than his share of pandering to get the bubba vote. Before he ran for president he was pretty liberal on social issues.
 
Last edited:
Wrong.

DePape provided the police with a political motivation for his violent actions. It's just not what you want to hear. DePape targeted Nancy Pelosi due to her leadership standing in the Democratic Party, and his belief that Democrats are liars.

I'm sorry that reading comprehension is such a challenge for you.
No I’m 100% right there were no direct statements you are just selling your own inference. By his historical behavior he is clearly a far left progressive. Currently the only clear thing about him is he’s 🦇 💩 crazy
 
Your best approach is to blame people for their actions. Rioters for rioting. Attackers for attacking. Shooters for shooting. Unless the public figure organized, planned, and instructed the event.
That doesn't further a political party so it isn't en vogue.

Nice. Whatta man you are to make this post . Really giving him something he can feel on this one. Something he can hold on to. It takes wisdom to pull a guy aside and tell him "free your mind."
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
No I’m 100% right there were no direct statements you are just selling your own inference. By his historical behavior he is clearly a far left progressive. Currently the only clear thing about him is he’s 🦇 💩 crazy
By his own statement to the police, DePape clearly targeted Nancy Pelosi because she is a leader in the Democratic Party, and he thinks Democrats are liars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
By his own statement to the police, DePape clearly targeted Nancy Pelosi because she is a leader in the Democratic Party, and he thinks Democrats are liars.
Still selling your inference BB. And that’s all it is. His only verified party affiliation from the past is Green Party. Look it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Majors
Still selling your inference BB. And that’s all it is. His only verified party affiliation from the past is Green Party. Look it up.
I'm talking only about his statements to the police. That is what matters the most.

He gave the police a motive for his actions. He intended to take Nancy Pelosi as a hostage, and break her kneecaps. His stated motive for doing that was that Nancy Pelosi was a leader of the pack of lies being told by the Democratic Party. I'm not inferring anything, or reading between the lines. It's under 15 a. of the affidavit. You should try reading it ... or maybe have someone read it to you - if you have gone full retard like the guy in Tropic Thunder.
 
No I’m 100% right there were no direct statements you are just selling your own inference. By his historical behavior he is clearly a far left progressive. Currently the only clear thing about him is he’s 🦇 💩 crazy
Alleged Paul Pelosi attacker posted multiple conspiracy theories

“Last year, David DePape posted links on his Facebook page to multiple videos produced by My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell falsely alleging that the 2020 election was stolen.”

Would you say this is “far left progressive” behavior?
 
Still selling your inference BB. And that’s all it is. His only verified party affiliation from the past is Green Party. Look it up.


Wasting your time ND... this guy is too far gone to see the obvious. He actually went and quoted someones post saying they were making hateful comments for calling a Dem "idiot" and "evil". Planks and splinters etc...as if every Repub isnt always labeled racist, homophobe, bigot, deplorable, nazi, Hitler, neo-nazi, fascist, etc as well as constant references to anyone who doesnt agree with drive by abortions and tranny sex story time as stupid, uneducated, ignorant, "science denier" whatever the Hell they hoped that would mean etc etc it is truly endless.

You cannot deny that this country, economy, and everyone in it are MUCH better off now that " the adults are in power" again, right???

Red wave in a few weeks. Turns out that people get super pizzed when their entire life savings and 401k get reduced by a THIRD in only 2 years of these "adults" in charge...
 
I'm talking only about his statements to the police. That is what matters the most.

He gave the police a motive for his actions. He intended to take Nancy Pelosi as a hostage, and break her kneecaps. His stated motive for doing that was that Nancy Pelosi was a leader of the pack of lies being told by the Democratic Party. I'm not inferring anything, or reading between the lines. It's under 15 a. of the affidavit. You should try reading it ... or maybe have someone read it to you - if you have gone full retard like the guy in Tropic Thunder.

Might want to edit that last line. Regardless of quoting movies of actors in blackface, if this is your go to line then it's telling. This isn't your first time using this term over the years.
 
Alleged Paul Pelosi attacker posted multiple conspiracy theories

“Last year, David DePape posted links on his Facebook page to multiple videos produced by My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell falsely alleging that the 2020 election was stolen.”

Would you say this is “far left progressive” behavior?
Nope. But this doesn’t show him to be a Repub either. We know he was Green Party and he REALLY hates Nancy.

Much like yourself who claims to be conservative yet voted for that idiot Biden due to your hatred of Trump wouldn’t you say? Are you a Democrat now?
 
Nobody is asking you to defend anybody.

The whole point is to confront you with contrary examples and gauge the lengths you’ll go to to avoid internalizing reality.

No. 2:

Trump Says 'Never Trumpers' Are 'Human Scum' In Bizarre Twitter Tirade
I'm not here to play 20 questions with you on Trump. The first example was a poor one and I pointed that out. As for Trump, is he really a conservative? I would say not. My original comment was about conservatives/liberals.

In honor of you, I will address your No. 2.

In this example Trump is taking the term "Never Trumpers" quite personally and I think we can all see why. The term itself is very personal so yeah, he lashed back. I think his comment was genuine and truthful. I appreciate my pols being genuine and not pols. I agree that's not for everyone but it's his unfiltered comments that got him elected in the first place
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Nope. But this doesn’t show him to be a Repub either. We know he was Green Party and he REALLY hates Nancy.

Much like yourself who claims to be conservative yet voted for that idiot Biden due to your hatred of Trump wouldn’t you say? Are you a Democrat now?

Oh, you thought that was all.

“Other posts included transphobic images”

I guess we can mostly skip that as there is room for subjective disagreement over what “transphobic” means, but this certainly seems like it would be inconsistent with far left progressivism.

So how about this, instead:

“…and linked to websites claiming Covid vaccines were deadly. "The death rates being promoted are what ever 'THEY' want to be promoted as the death rate," one post read.”

Do you recall far left progressives being against vaccines and claiming that the death rates for Covid were misrepresented by a nebulous “they” or was that more of a Trumpkin behavior?
 
I'm talking only about his statements to the police. That is what matters the most.

He gave the police a motive for his actions. He intended to take Nancy Pelosi as a hostage, and break her kneecaps. His stated motive for doing that was that Nancy Pelosi was a leader of the pack of lies being told by the Democratic Party. I'm not inferring anything, or reading between the lines. It's under 15 a. of the affidavit. You should try reading it ... or maybe have someone read it to you - if you have gone full retard like the guy in Tropic Thunder.
I am too. He made ZERO affirmative statements as to his own party affiliation in those statements. But we know he really doesn’t like Nancy and think she’s a liar
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Wasting your time ND... this guy is too far gone to see the obvious. He actually went and quoted someones post saying they were making hateful comments for calling a Dem "idiot" and "evil". Planks and splinters etc...as if every Repub isnt always labeled racist, homophobe, bigot, deplorable, nazi, Hitler, neo-nazi, fascist, etc as well as constant references to anyone who doesnt agree with drive by abortions and tranny sex story time as stupid, uneducated, ignorant, "science denier" whatever the Hell they hoped that would mean etc etc it is truly endless.

You cannot deny that this country, economy, and everyone in it are MUCH better off now that " the adults are in power" again, right???

Red wave in a few weeks. Turns out that people get super pizzed when their entire life savings and 401k get reduced by a THIRD in only 2 years of these "adults" in charge...
Oh I know. I’m not trying to convince him I’m just aggravating him 😬
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols

VN Store



Back
Top