Pearl embarrassed, but hopes violations doesn't result in termination

So you didn't give a damn in the first place, but felt the need to justify yourself anyways...

No I said I didnt give a damn that he gave a damn that I gave a damn to post the damn message. See, You've got me all wrong. Martin, TN huh? Ever visit the Burg?
 
Youre calling for sources and links is enough reason to question your intelligence.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

To question my intelligence? Are you saying that my wanting proof isn't smart? Are you serious? You question my intelligence because I'm looking for facts? Wanting to know the truth is dumb? Do you realize that I'm asking for evidence so I can determine if the information is reliable? You're saying that this is dumb?

If this is what you're saying, this will be one of the instances I won't argue back. If you really believe that, I won't be able to convince you otherwise.
 
I simply saying that you have difficulty putting post contents together as you did with me yesterday, when I was in agreement with you. You then proceeded to attack me and start calling me names. You became extremely upset for no apparent reason. My comment is that if you have to resort to bashing and name calling that resulted in the posts being removed, it is a reflection of your intellectual functioning, as well as being hypocritical as you bash others for doing the same thing.
 
Having to resort to bashing and name calling is an excellent barometer of overall intelligence.

Lucky for you, I personally wouldn't use that criteria to evaluate anyone's competence; for you are guilty of bashing and name calling too. Granted, not nearly to the extent of LawVol & co., but I don't think that calling someone out for being ridiculously rude necessarily reflects their intelligence....even if I did call you an ass. I probably didn't need to do that, but that's how frustrated you made me, and I'm not remorseful in the least bit for it.
 
I simply saying that you have difficulty putting post contents together as you did with me yesterday, when I was in agreement with you. You then proceeded to attack me and start calling me names. You became extremely upset for no apparent reason. My comment is that if you have to resort to bashing and name calling that resulted in the posts being removed, it is a reflection of your intellectual functioning, as well as being hypocritical as you bash others for doing the same thing.

I'm sorry, BVF, but I don't think I will ever believe that you were trying to agree with me. Nothing about your post suggested that, per my interpretation. The biggest flaw was that you replied to my quote. You then were being super-sarcastic in your response to me, then insulted the intelligence of "some people" (again, in your response to my post). You have the argument that "some people" was not me, but everything else points in the opposite direction. Did you really expect me to believe that you weren't talking about me? Why would I think you were talking about anyone else? It's a classic formula here on VN: "oh, I don't like what so-and-so said, so I'm going to insult him...but it's way too direct to just to say it, so I'll say 'some people'." It's EVERYWHERE on this site. The whole of your argument just does not add up.
 
Last edited:
To question my intelligence? Are you saying that my wanting proof isn't smart? Are you serious? You question my intelligence because I'm looking for facts? Wanting to know the truth is dumb? Do you realize that I'm asking for evidence so I can determine if the information is reliable? You're saying that this is dumb?

If this is what you're saying, this will be one of the instances I won't argue back. If you really believe that, I won't be able to convince you otherwise.

You have been repeatedly told by some people who have an iq substantially higher than you, yet you continue to beg for someone to give you their source.

I've read enough of your garbage to correctly peg your intelligence level.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
You have been repeatedly told by some people who have an iq substantially higher than you, yet you continue to beg for someone to give you their source.

I've read enough of your garbage to correctly peg your intelligence level.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I understand that people with sources don't want to compromise them. But if you can't offer a shred of any kind of evidence, why is it dumb for me to question how they know the information? Anyone can make a statement and back it up by saying "I have sources". There's nothing that would stop me or anyone else for claiming that if I or they wanted to. We're just posters on VN, we're not Gary Parrish, Andy Katz, Jay Bilas, etc. so why am i supposed to believe anything like that? Why is that stupid?
 
I'm sorry, BVF, but I don't think I will ever believe that you were trying to agree with me. Nothing about your post suggested that, per my interpretation. The biggest flaw was that you replied to my quote. You then were being super-sarcastic in your response to me, then insulted the intelligence of "some people" (again, in your response to my post). You have the argument that "some people" was not me, but everything else points in the opposite direction. Did you really expect me to believe that you weren't talking about me? Why would I think you were talking about anyone else? It's a classic formula here on VN: "oh, I don't like what so-and-so said, so I'm going to insult him...but it's way too direct to just to say it, so I'll say 'some people'." It's EVERYWHERE on this site. The whole of your argument just does not add up.

Clearly I am talking specifically about you in my most recent posts. I could care less if you believe me and I won't waste time responding to any more of your posts as you can't comprehend any posts anyway. I have absolutely no problem in letting people know when I am talking directly to them. If you think this site is so bad, perhaps you should simply find another board to post on. Perhaps, there would be folks there that are more suited to your level of comprehension.
 
I understand that people with sources don't want to compromise them. But if you can't offer a shred of any kind of evidence, why is it dumb for me to question how they know the information? Anyone can make a statement and back it up by saying "I have sources". There's nothing that would stop me or anyone else for claiming that if I or they wanted to. We're just posters on VN, we're not Gary Parrish, Andy Katz, Jay Bilas, etc. so why am i supposed to believe anything like that? Why is that stupid?

Let me guess, youre the type that hung on every post griff posted on his tumultuous time here?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Clearly I am talking specifically about you in my most recent posts. I could care less if you believe me and I won't waste time responding to any more of your posts as you can't comprehend any posts anyway. I have absolutely no problem in letting people know when I am talking directly to them. If you think this site is so bad, perhaps you should simply find another board to post on. Perhaps, there would be folks there that are more suited to your level of comprehension.

Fair enough. But I enjoy this site, and I obviously enjoy debating. It beats the hell out of posting on GVX.
 
Let me guess, youre the type that hung on every post griff posted on his tumultuous time here?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

So you're saying he's not on here anymore? I don't recall seeing any of his posts; it may have been before I joined VN. If I did ever see any of his posts, I didn't know it was him. Hmmmm....I'm not sure how I'd feel about his posts. I guess I'd need to assess some of his comments first.
 
So you're saying he's not on here anymore? I don't recall seeing any of his posts; it may have been before I joined VN. If I did ever see any of his posts, I didn't know it was him. Hmmmm....I'm not sure how I'd feel about his posts. I guess I'd need to assess some of his comments first.

Yet you beg and plead for sources without assessing others comments over time?

Seems to be inconsistent.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Yet you beg and plead for sources without assessing others comments over time?

Seems to be inconsistent.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Actually, my assessing of the comments inspired me to question. I thought to myself, "This guy is presenting some very interesting information. It would be awesome if I knew how true it was."
 
I understand that people with sources don't want to compromise them. But if you can't offer a shred of any kind of evidence, why is it dumb for me to question how they know the information? Anyone can make a statement and back it up by saying "I have sources". There's nothing that would stop me or anyone else for claiming that if I or they wanted to. We're just posters on VN, we're not Gary Parrish, Andy Katz, Jay Bilas, etc. so why am i supposed to believe anything like that? Why is that stupid?

There is nothing wrong with asking people to back up their statements. Anyone trying to make you feel stupid for doing so is stupid themselves. The poster formerly known as Lofton4Three (NYYVol) is so busy worshiping everything Hat says that his thoughts frequently become incoherent.
 
There is nothing wrong with asking people to back up their statements. Anyone trying to make you feel stupid for doing so is stupid themselves. The poster formerly known as Lofton4Three (NYYVol) is so busy worshiping everything Hat says that his thoughts frequently become incoherent.

What in the hell does hat have to do with anything?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Let me guess, youre the type that hung on every post griff posted on his tumultuous time here?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Which means he's one of those Tennessee fans still trying to find UNC in the NIT Season Tipoff field.
 
Which means he's one of those Tennessee fans still trying to find UNC in the NIT Season Tipoff field.

Mention that Monte Kiffin has a better resume and is a better coach than Chavis and watch the meltdown.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 

VN Store



Back
Top