None of this has to do with my argument at all. LawVol claims to have good sources, but refuses to elaborate on that in any way. If he can't even give one minuscule piece of proof about his sources, how in the world is anyone supposed to give him credibility? Since a lot of people understand that, it's completely reasonable to question his integrity, which is what I'm doing.
I know you probably haven't paid too much attention to any of my posts that weren't directed at you, but I share my opinion, which doesn't need any credibility, nor do I claim to have any. Furthermore, I always consider what anyone has to say. You may see some of my old posts where I'm debating someone and if they make a good point, I recognize that and give them credit for their argument being better than mine. I'm not an egomaniac, I concede if I'm wrong.
Lastly, I think everyone here, even the people I don't like or disagree with, have the right to voice their opinions. However, I believe that insulting anyone's intelligence is rude and unacceptable especially when the insultee clearly explains their opinion and stands by it in the barrage of insults (which happens 95% of the time). My point is, I never have, nor will I ever bash anyone just for having a different opinion. I bash you and LawVol because you're just so effing rude, close-minded, and completely unwilling to consider any other view besides your own.