Again, you leveled the lame 25 win strawman. You didnt prove Jack. I said 40 teams per year do it. that's not meritorious. Top 40 wins list isn't a measure in basketball. Final eight at tourney time is. You threw out a measure that I find worthless. I disimissed it. Your rebuttal disnt make it any more meaningful. Climbing win total in college ball are crap. Teams play a limited number of competitive style meaningful games. All the rest are prep.
Again, you presented a point superfluous to the conversation about replacing Pearl if necessary. Maybe you'll recall that. Your measure is not THE measure. THE measure is nearly universally agreed to be March.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
How hard is this to understand, seriously? I was arguing a specific point, nothing, not one damn word, about the postseason. I was arguing why the 25 wins average was an accomplishment, not the be all end all you keep saying that I mention.
So, the postseason is important? More important than winning 25 games a year? Duh. Thanks for the brilliant observation. I never said otherwise. However, the season does serve a purpose and so winning 25 a year does have value and shows consistancy.
How is bringing in a guy who whined and cried about being asked to sacrifice for the team at Marquette raising the character bar?Slurper or not, I know he's not going anywhere with the 2010 class and Maymon coming to town. Does anyone else think this class is an intentional departure in terms of character, of recruits Bruce has brought to campus in his tenure?
Indiana > 0%....
Me the martyr? You're the one whining that I gave your "victory" jab a counter. You weren't proven right. Nobody looked after that stat was dismissed as meaningless. Maybe that's what you missed. Nobody considers average reg season wins irreplaceable. You were using it as your argument. Thats crap.
Your specific bs was simply interjecting a meaningless stat to the debate. Prior to your gallant arrival, it wasn't a measure here. You keep chastising people for failure to follow your points throughout the thread. PM yourself here and get it straight. You brought crap. You could have just as easily lobbed in his Maccabi games title.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
We haven't had one of those guys ever (except on the ladies side). Probably lots of us no longer have the energy to chase that select elite level and we just root for who we have at the time.The entire conversation is about the replaceability of our coach. Again with the context thing upon which you like to harp. High wins and early bowouts got Green fired. It will get Pearl fired if unaddressed. He can be replaced with a guy who can win March ballgames, regardless of your amazing specific point that I so brazenly find meaningless.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Uh oh! The circle jerk has arrived!! Where's Loften, Law..? It's about time to circle the wagons and have the smartest people tell each other how much more intelligent they are.
Why does that matter when 16 look like this:
Austin Peay
UNC Asheville
East Carolina
College of Charleston
ETSU
Middle Tennessee State
Wyoming
NC A&T
Charlotte
Auburn
Alabama
LSU
South Carolina (Home)
Georgia
South Carolina (Away)
LSU (SECT)
The entire conversation is about the replaceability of our coach. Again with the context thing upon which you like to harp. High wins and early bowouts got Green fired. It will get Pearl fired if unaddressed. He can be replaced with a guy who can win March ballgames, regardless of your amazing specific point that I so brazenly find meaningless.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Who is "nobody"? The other people who weren't involved in the specific argument in the first place? And why is it that the same group who proclaims themselves smarter than everyone else uses the falacious bandwagon argument?
Green got fired for a multitude of reasons that Pearl hasn't come close to needing to address. And, once again, tell me why the coach with the best NCAA record in school history will "get fired if unaddressed"?
Besides, if you you go back to my original argument, you'll notice my stance was much different than the one you have been stating. I assume, though, that you got caught up in the specific argument that only became "meaningless" when I demostrated it wasn't as common as you were professing.
Arrived?!? I have been in the thread all day and addressed you at 9:30.
Nice attempt to deflect though. Now about that proof?
that's just dumb. Tennessee consistently plays a pretty tough regular season schedule, and you find cupcakes on everyones schedule. You can't complain too much about the regular season under Pearl. I can accept the post season criticism. But for the most part, his regular seasons have been a success.
btw, congratulations on being on the thread all day. that's incredible
Green got fired for losing in the tourney, period. All the other was excuses.
Your argument was tgat 25 wins on average is some magical, mythical accomplishment that we can't replace. It was properly addressed as hollow and meaningless.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
No, I didn't, that's just what you decided I said. I said that 25 wins is nothing to spit at and was not common, a very good accomplishment not made by many highly respected coaches. Nowhere did I say it was some "magical" accomplishment and the determining factor in a great coach. I did say it was a signifier of a very good and consistant coach. Obviously, March is the most important component of college ball.
Also, Green got fired because he refused to recruit, constant fading at the end of the season, dwindling attendence, lack of respect among his players and dislike of him among administrators as well as losing by 30 to SW Missouri St.