LawVol13
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 11,524
- Likes
- 0
I'm sorry but I don't see how Joe Pa fulfilled his legal obligation under the quoted statute. The staff member reported the abuse to his superior, in this case Joe Pa, and the obligation was on him to report. To say that he fulfilled his obligation by reporting to the Ad, when brought to its ultimate conclusion, would result in only the president of State U being responsible to report, a consequence the statute never intended. Joe PA, as HEAD COACH, has the responsibility to report when HIS STAFF reports the abuse to him.
It would obviously come down to whether Joe Pa is considered a staff member or someone up the chain in the context of the statute.