LawVol13
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 11,524
- Likes
- 0
I would argue that the problem with giving Paterno this out is that Happy Valley didn't operate this way. Paterno would have been involved in any discussion about cutting deals or at least privy to the details of how the situation was handled.
YorkVol, I'm not challenging you on this by any means: where does this info come from? Because if the GA was around Sandusky a lot as a kid, there's a whole other set of possible reasons for his silence and continued employment.
It made my hair stand up when I read this.
Ok, here's the issue that you and I have with this.
What's worse: someone being placed on administrative leave for a few weeks and having to tell his wife what's going on while having the legal recourse to sue whoever wrongfully accused him if it's a baseless allegation OR
Allowing a monstrous child rapist to continue using the same facilities to rape more children?
To me, that answer is very, very easy.
Been to Ringgold too, want me to share some personal perspective?
Appears you guys missed the point about State College, its not exactly a metropolis.
To be fair, as I understand that situation, Paterno pleaded for another year and promised results; then, Paterno delivered with an 11-1 season.
This is an incredible stance, especially considering your military background.
Are we supposed to prove someone is suicidal until they actually pull it off? Yep, he's suicidal. (as he's hanging from a tree)
I saw this in another article but this is the only source I could find right now.
In Defense of Mike McQueary - Black Shoe Diaries
That's a good observation. But, I think we're all kidding ourselves if we pretend that Joe Pa didn't have more power than the AD in Happy Valley. He was and to many still is a god there. Prior to this mess, I would say it's absolutely accurate to say that Joe Pa could have gotten the AD fired quicker than the AD could have gotten Joe Pa fired.
I will grant that; however, having such power does not automatically mean that Paterno wanted to be involved nor was involved in the weeds of this investigation/cover-up/conspiracy.
Explain this, Darwinism. How does this statement support your "disassociation" claim?
Joe Paterno, president Graham Spanier out at Penn State - ESPN
It doesn't automatically mean that. But, that could certainly be inferred from the facts we know. That's why continuing to investigate all of this criminally is an absolute must.
And, it also means that this so-called protocol that requires reporting things up the chain of command is bogus. Joe Paterno was at the top of the chain of command in the athletic department.
I am not opposed to this being investigated criminally by any and every organization out there.