Actually, for what it's worth, I liked the contribution he made in the post you criticized.
These "up and coming" coaches cannot build a legacy on potential. At some point, they too have to produce results. And, when they fail, it's as fair to point that out as it is to tout how great they are before they've proven anything.
You're right about one thing. Coaching may not be as easy to do as it is to criticize. But, UT fans need not limit their criticism to our coaches to be good fans. Heck, there's plenty to attack in all these new guys who are going to 'revolutionize the game.'
Doing something no other team does and gives a team an advantage in the short run, but doing something that is sustainable is the true test of a coach. The former can be done moving every few years, but the later requires some stability.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.