Pig Howard tweet

#228
#228
We won so I don't really care. Ugly wins are still wins.

Worley does look terrible at times, and there is no way to sugar coat that. Maybe we luck out and he has the game of his career next Saturday against Georgia.
 
#229
#229
I didn't have high expectations going into this season, so I'm not really shocked about where we are at. These things take time. I will be concerned in 2 years when we still can't beat ranked teams. If CBJ can hang onto this upcoming recruiting class, then I think you will see some improvement next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#230
#230
If you remember a few years back, it was the georgia game when Crompton finally woke up and started playing better.
 
#233
#233
ive seen elementary kids throw better than Worley. whoever taught him to throw the ball needs to be arrested and charged with fraud or something. His accuracy is awful.
 
#234
#234
gobraves101035 said:
ive seen elementary kids throw better than Worley. whoever taught him to throw the ball needs to be arrested and charged with fraud or something. His accuracy is awful.
Click to expand...

What completion percentage would you consider to be accurate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#236
#236
DC Vol said:
At least 8-90% on screens is a good place to start?
Click to expand...

It was a serious question. I honestly don't know what the target percentage is for a college quarterback to be considered accurate. 60%?
 
#237
#237
Worley was 56% today. His underneath misses are a mystery. Those should be gimmees. If he cleans that up... he'd have been closer to 70%.

I would say 60% is where you start calling a guy an accurate passer. Bray was under 60% for his career at UT and was never over it for a season. But he threw more deep balls than most CFB QB's. Ainge was 64% in Cut's dink and dunk O.
 
#238
#238
I would say in the 60%? In the NFL it's 67%. It may have went up since all of the rule changes in the league these days, but I remember 65-67% was desirable in the NFL a couple years ago. In college? Somewhere in the 60s would be good. To me it depends on the team around that QB. I've watched every game this year and there wasn't one half where Worley didn't at least throw one or two grounders to the receiver if not throw behind them. It's frustrating to see Worley dropback to pass when we know 3 out of 4 times he'll in inaccurate with the pass. How bad must the freshmen be if the coaches continue to go with this guy. I wouldn't be surprise to see Georgia load the box and make Worley throw until he pass for 3 first downs in a half.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#239
#239
Freak said:
It was a serious question. I honestly don't know what the target percentage is for a college quarterback to be considered accurate. 60%?
Click to expand...
60+ percent is the benchmark, it seems. Worley was about 45% against UF and threw 2 picks in that game, and people here act like putting him in silenced the critics. Uh....no, it didn't.
 
#240
#240
If you take away the screen passes and roll outs where he dumbed it to the TE for 3 yards he would have about 45% Completion % in 6 full quarters of play he has 6 pics not to much of a game manger to me....
 
#243
#243
Vols021 said:
I didn't have high expectations going into this season, so I'm not really shocked about where we are at. These things take time. I will be concerned in 2 years when we still can't beat ranked teams. If CBJ can hang onto this upcoming recruiting class, then I think you will see some improvement next year.
Click to expand...
I am all in with you on this brother! We knew we would suck this year; after all, look at the mess Dooley/Kiffin/Fulmer left us with!
 
#244
#244
TGVol said:
They need to stop talking and promising and instead shut up and put together a better game plan (this is the second game in the row where they got severely out coached - and after today's game the excuse can not be that the other team had better talent).
Click to expand...

They had one hell of a better QB than we did!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#248
#248
armchair said:
Twitter and smart phones are little more than self-esteem devices for young people. This whole idea that with tweet and texts you must inform your friends and lots of other people what you are doing or thinking throughout the day--and they, you. And so you must check your phone every 30 seconds all day--people checking for emails/texts/tweets while they're driving. It's comical--it's like a shut-in getting junk mail: "I'm somebody!" And I say his as somebody who tweets and who has followers--why, I don't know. Many people follow thousands of people on Twitter, which means that they must be looking at their phone screens all days as tweets come rolling in. 98 percent egotistical waste of time. If you are an entrepreneur and have a business that is dependent on the public in some way, twitter is beneficial; otherwise, not so much.
Click to expand...

#2PEECES OMG!!!!! i jus use 4 TP''s 2 wip mi azz sted o 2 don tell cheryl!!! lol govols
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#249
#249
Has anybody read his follow up tweet. Geesh. There are way too many grade school kids on here acting like someone ate their cookies....
 
#250
#250
This is not the time for this team to fall apart, circle the wagons play for each other or this season will get uglier.
There is still something to play for, C'mon MAN ! Stand up and be a man or get killed for the rest of the season. :aggressive:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top