Police shooting black man in the back ... again (Kenosha, WI)

#2,726
#2,726
carlos86 said:
Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, accused of shooting people in the streets of Kenosha, WI, now faces five felony charges. He is charged with one count of first-degree intentional homicide and one count of first-degree reckless homicide.

He also is charged with a count of attempted intentional homicide and two counts of recklessly endangering safety.

Additionally, he faces a misdemeanor charge of being in possession of a dangerous weapon while under the age of 18.
Click to expand...
Link?
 
#2,727
#2,727
carlos86 said:
Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, accused of shooting people in the streets of Kenosha, WI, now faces five felony charges. He is charged with one count of first-degree intentional homicide and one count of first-degree reckless homicide.

He also is charged with a count of attempted intentional homicide and two counts of recklessly endangering safety.

Additionally, he faces a misdemeanor charge of being in possession of a dangerous weapon while under the age of 18.
Click to expand...
Probation for the underage gun charge will be all they should get
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13, mr.checkerboards and Rickyvol77
#2,729
#2,729
evillawyer said:
I'm guessing they also get him on recklessly endangering safety was well. On the more serious charges, he walks.
Click to expand...
Maybe. It's going to be determined by how this is applied:

Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense as follows:
(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.
Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48
 
#2,733
#2,733
utvolpj said:
Like the other young man who was crucified in the media based on early pics and reports?
Click to expand...
The speaker for the RNC who was scrapped because of anti-semetic statements would likely have been elevated to keynote speaker for the DNC
 
#2,735
#2,735
carlos86 said:
Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, accused of shooting people in the streets of Kenosha, WI, now faces five felony charges. He is charged with one count of first-degree intentional homicide and one count of first-degree reckless homicide.

He also is charged with a count of attempted intentional homicide and two counts of recklessly endangering safety.

Additionally, he faces a misdemeanor charge of being in possession of a dangerous weapon while under the age of 18.
Click to expand...
He will be found not guilty.
 
#2,739
#2,739
Orangeslice13 said:
And the victims of DWI should pay for alcohol treatment from the people who run them over .....if they survive.

talk about privileged......”you don’t need to defend yourself “. It’s really hard to believe people like you are real
Click to expand...


The victims of DWI do not knowingly seek out DWI drivers then stop suddenly right in front of them. That kid was no victim. You are not a victim if you invite something just to set up your reaction to it. Kid was LOOKING for a reason to shoot.
 
#2,741
#2,741
lawgator1 said:
The victims of DWI do not knowingly seek out DWI drivers then stop suddenly right in front of them. That kid was no victim. You are not a victim if you invite something just to set up your reaction to it. Kid was LOOKING for a reason to shoot.
Click to expand...
He was running away you dolt.
He was running because someone said “that’s the guy who was cleaning up the graffiti, get him”. He got knocked down and was attacked while on the ground. It’s self defense and there’s no other way to look at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Y9 Vol, tennvols77, Rickyvol77 and 2 others
#2,744
#2,744
lawgator1 said:
The victims of DWI do not knowingly seek out DWI drivers then stop suddenly right in front of them. That kid was no victim. You are not a victim if you invite something just to set up your reaction to it. Kid was LOOKING for a reason to shoot.
Click to expand...
Maybe there will be more video to come out because every video so far I’ve seen has been of him running away from the people chasing him, throwing things at him, or assaulting him.
 
#2,745
#2,745
Somebody hand me a kleenex. I seem to be out at the moment.

GriCVQt.jpg
 
Last edited:
#2,748
#2,748
RockyTop85 said:
I don’t hear her say “for that subject.” I reloaded the page and re-ran it more than once to make sure it wasn’t a bad download.

It’s garbled, but to me it sounds like she says “we have an alert at that address for a 99 subject.” I don’t hear the “for that” at all. I’d be more inclined to assume I’m just crazy, except that the MJS reporter wrote that blurb the way he did, which indicates that he doesn’t hear it, either.

They were also told that he left the scene.

So there’s still nothing in that call that says they should roll up guns blazing, IMO.

So, I think you’re correct: how did it go from that to 7 gunshots in 3 minutes is still the question.
Click to expand...
I went back and listen to it a few more times and while it isn't real clear it sounds like " we have an alert at this address for a 99 for that subject."

As I said its not crystal clear but its apparent to me she said something in between 99 and subject.

Yes, they were told he left but he either circled the block or never did. Maybe he left the house and that satisfied her. Maybe the girl calling knew he was going to be arrested and thought they may not come if she told them he was gone. Apparently there come a point where she wasn't cooperating after she originally did. IDK.

I firmly believe the cops showed up to arrest Blake for the warrant that was issued. And it makes good sense why it escaulated that quickly given the reason for the 911 call had apparently been diffused without incident.

When someone doesn't want to be arrested it creates a bad situation for everybody. Im sure you have some edgy cops that don't mind it may even like it, but the ones I know would rather it not put them or anyone else at risk. At the end of the day they are people just the same as me.
Its not a job I envy for that reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb and Rickyvol77
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top