Police shooting black man in the back ... again (Kenosha, WI)

EgdH2qVU0AElj_Z
I always love when they out themselves. Where's @k-town_king talking about how the kid with a 3:0 casualty ratio is weak?
 
Ten bucks says you're a Luke Bryan fan.
I had to look him up can’t say that I know a single song of his. Isnt he a judge on one of those talent shows? If I’m gonna listen to country it’s more Willie’s Roadhouse or outlaw country. I’d say Chris Stapleton is more along my liking for new country artists. He does a damn good version of Tennessee Whiskey.

So pay me biatch!!!
 
The cops were told he was the reason for the original call, and what those circumstances were. Including the idea that he wasn't supposed to be there. (Not sure if she (the caller) didn't want him there or if there was a legal order). The cops were later told of the alert ("99") for that subject.

After that, about the only thing you could question is how did they know they were approaching Jacob Blake at the scene. And similar to the previous conversation they either guessed or they asked him and he identified himself. Either way they didn't mistake him for a relative, neighbor or friend of Jacob Blake.

I don’t hear her say “for that subject.” I reloaded the page and re-ran it more than once to make sure it wasn’t a bad download.

It’s garbled, but to me it sounds like she says “we have an alert at that address for a 99 subject.” I don’t hear the “for that” at all. I’d be more inclined to assume I’m just crazy, except that the MJS reporter wrote that blurb the way he did, which indicates that he doesn’t hear it, either.

They were also told that he left the scene.

So there’s still nothing in that call that says they should roll up guns blazing, IMO.

So, I think you’re correct: how did it go from that to 7 gunshots in 3 minutes is still the question.
 
A bailout in the 1890's wasn't after the Civil War? A potus from the 20th century wasn't either? I'm guessing the events I describe don't make much sense to you then

Trump built on the expansion by Obama who built on the expansion by Bush who built on.....
One is not possible without the others.

I've read plenty on the fall of the Roman empire and our founding fathers. I know my history or at least have the good sense to Google it first. I'll be fine without another podcast

So executive power is expanding, and yet it has also become more incompetent than ever.. yet everything is the same? Meanwhile, checks and balances are being widdled away, and you dont think we're living in a historically dangerous time? I got news for ya buddy, it is.

There is, simply in terms of monetary value, faaar more money in politics than there used to be. The more money, the higher the stakes. Btw, when was the last time we had 26 trillion dollars in Federal debt?
 
Last edited:
The shooter should pay the medical bills of the people he shot.


And the victims of DWI should pay for alcohol treatment from the people who run them over .....if they survive.

talk about privileged......”you don’t need to defend yourself “. It’s really hard to believe people like you are real
 
So executive power is expanding, and yet it has also become more incompetent than ever.. yet everything is the same? Meanwhile, checks and balances are being widdled away, and you dont think we're living in a historically dangerous time? I got news for ya buddy, it is.

There is, simply in terms of monetary value, faaar more money in politics than there used to be. The more money, the higher the stakes. Btw, when was the last time we had a 26 trillion dollar defecit?
Historically dangerous and you want to make it worse by sticking an old man with dementia in the oval office? Rights will decline, taxes will increase (or debt will), and the divide will grow bigger no matter who is elected. This is more than a trump problem
 
You didn't provide anything other than your request to link it.

After that inflated post of yours, my ego is not in question or in need of salvaging.
1598566360349.png
🤦🏻‍♂️

Now, tell me again what “providing the necessary context” means to you?
 
Historically dangerous and you want to make it worse by sticking an old man with dementia in the oval office? Rights will decline, taxes will increase (or debt will), and the divide will grow bigger no matter who is elected. This is more than a trump problem

You're absolutely right- it's way more than a Trump problem. Like I said earlier, it's douche vs. turd
People should really cut it with the dementia thing. Trump has far worse psycological impairments and every moderate voter knows it. It's a losing argument and it's drawing more attention to his weaknesses, aka his mental state. It's political gaslighting.

I just read the other day that he didn't even know that Finland was a separate country from Russia.

In the words of his own niece- "The change of stories. The lack of preparation. The lying. Holy ****."
 
View attachment 302764
🤦🏻‍♂️

Now, tell me again what “providing the necessary context” means to you?

Are any of those replies directed at any of my posts towards you? No. Rather than just provide a response to my initial question, you requested me to go searching through your posts to prove it. I'm supposed to answer my own question? Some of you on the left...I swear.

Moving on...

BTW, charge your battery.
 

VN Store



Back
Top