Police shooting black man in the back ... again (Kenosha, WI)

He was a thug looking for trouble. Started a fight. Got whooped. Then shot some people. A real hero to the right. Sad
He was running away and got jumped and outnumbered.....AND the dude that got his arm blasted had a gun. They were all looking fir trouble or they wouldn’t have been out there to begin with.
 
They had no evidence of a crime. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer? He had done nothing. They banged on his door during the middle of the night with guns drawn. What if he had shot them? Would that be a legal shoot? Cops have zero right to threaten citizens who have broken no laws. A gun in my face is a threat. It is a bs tactic that is trained and because of it this man is dead. He dropped to knees. And was executed. You call it a legal shoot.

And btw, he and his wife were playing video games.
Sure they were :rolleyes: i always play Fortnite loud enough to where two separate neighbors call the police on me :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: sierraorange
It's almost like guns make us less safe.

This is actually an amazing representation of the value of the 2nd amendment. The only ones that guns make it less safe for are those trying to infringe on the right of others. Rioters and looters burning businesses absolutely should feel less safe. That is the whole point.
 
What do you think the point is here? The cops are at fault for putting themselves in the situation. I figure a 2a defender would support people protecting themselves against unidentified intruders that have no business being there. I guess not when they are black?
They were identified and were there legally...
 
he didn't do shat. Not anything manly or tough. He was a punk that went to start something thinking he would be okay because he was trying to intimidate people with a gun.

He got his butt kicked then shot like a punk. This is a true thug.
He is going home while the trash thugs are dead or in hospital, i would say that he protected himself fine
 
Say that to the one guy getting chased by 5 or 6 others.

Do you think the situation, absent the Rambo toy strapped around his neck, would have escalated so quickly and had the same ending without the gun? I don't.

It's really a simple proposition. Take 100 bar fights. Give those involved in 50 of them guns, and those involved in the other 50 no guns. Let's see which of the two groups result in more death and severe injuries. That's my point. Remove the guns, and there's a net benefit for safety overall. Guns are an accelerant when emotions get heated.
 
Do you think the situation, absent the Rambo toy strapped around his neck, would have escalated so quickly and had the same ending without the gun? I don't.

It's really a simple proposition. Take 100 bar fights. Give those involved in 50 of them guns, and those involved in the other 50 no guns. Let's see which of the two groups result in more death and severe injuries. That's my point. Remove the guns, and there's a net benefit for safety overall. Guns are an accelerant when emotions get heated.
so what? more people are killed in bar fights with punches to the head, and hitting their head on the concrete sidewalks than by guns in bar fights...
Guns are an inanimate object, some people are criminals, some are victims, some are idiots, some are defenders....the gun isn't the issue, the 500 criminals looting, burning buildings, smashing cars and assaulting people are the root cause of the issue
 

VN Store



Back
Top