hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,600
- Likes
- 162,849
I have not but looking forward to reading about it.Hey @Orangeslice13
Have you heard about this? Sounds crazy, there has to be one heck of a backstory here.
Riot breaks out after NYPD tries to seal secret synagogue tunnels in Brooklyn
A few years ago I saw a article about a song that was common in a tribe but some of the language in the song was not part of the current usage. Anyways, as they researched the song it had essentially not changed at all over thousands of years because it was shared person to person as a song. Now I'm not making a case that's what happened in oral history of biblical storytelling but it leads credibility to the possibility of something remained unchanged even though it is shared over thousands of years
I’m really not interested in that debate.depends on what you mean by impressive mathematics. a 20% miss isn't very impressive.
only if you start at the END of the construction of the temple, and end at Jesus's birth is it anywhere close. instead of "From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One,[f] the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens. After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing."
depending on what year you start and end at he is off by at LEAST 11 7's. thats at least a 15% fudge factor.
and that math just goes off the 70 7s instead of the 69 "numbered" 7s. if it was really the 69 that he numbers in there its 12 7s he is off at almost a 18% miss.
it gets worse once you consider the Jewish calendar is shorter than 365 days (355 days). over the course of the 70 7s that would be at least another 20 years. another 3 7s of miss. 15 7s (105 years) off over 70 7s (490) is north of 20%.
but i get it, the 7 number is important to theCanaanitesJews, so it was more important to be symbolic than accurate.
I can understand why someone who finds faith challenging would come to that conclusion.I think it is certainly possible for an oral tradition/song to go unchanged for large periods of time in an isolated, culturally stagnate and technologically unsophisticated tribe. I'd like to read the article if you can find it to see their specific situation. However I don't think that's quite so analogous to biblical translations where competing sects played around with the text on purpose to make it fit their beliefs, much less the probably even more common honest to god (hehe) mistakes made in translation.
I agree. If someone without faith didn't default to logic, I would be concerned.I'm just saying that I don't think you need to be a faithless heathen like me to see the differences in the two situations you are comparing.