deatojl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 515
- Likes
- 1,118
I think we can look at 4 years of DW, JH and Spyre and safely conclude that there was a plan for the most probable outcomes with Tate and the other portal WR's. Not all their plans have worked or been perfect, but unlike previous regimes, it's hard to criticize them not having and working a plan.Looks like it
Fact is, we need a take the top off type WR. We saw with Hyatt what our offense can look like with one. I personally think he will be a Vol and we can still add a few of ND' s Olinemen( or someone else's). It's not like we won't lose more guys in the spring, either by their choice or the Coach's. There will be available spots to go upgrade.If we don’t get Tate, please just get another OL from ND. I’d be more than happy to just do that instead anyways.
LT: Heard
LG: Pendleton
C: Moe
RG: Rocco
RT: Sanders
Would make me happier than getting Tate, imo. With those two at guard and Moe anchoring center, our run game would definitely be lethal again.
They will get someone they saw how bad we were hampered last year.If we don’t get Tate, please just get another OL from ND. I’d be more than happy to just do that instead anyways.
LT: Heard
LG: Pendleton
C: Moe
RG: Rocco
RT: Sanders
Would make me happier than getting Tate, imo. With those two at guard and Moe anchoring center, our run game would definitely be lethal again.