Because those players were older and more experienced vs young and inexperienced. Again, that’s how college football works. Young players come in, gain knowledge and experience, learn the system, get stronger, and replace the veterans who are moving on. I don’t know where this notion comes from that all freshmen should be starting year one or they are a bust.
Peyton Manning ran the offense in 97 and when he graduated it was automatically gonna be a step back the next year, until it wasn’t. You have to replace good/great players every year.
I don’t want my team relying on a bunch of freshman and sophomores. We saw it at LB this year. Carter is very talented, but he was out of position a lot because of inexperience. That isn’t ideal to me. Sprinkle in the young guys who are ready (they all develop differently) but rely on the upperclassmen.
You also have to remember, this roster is still transitioning from 3 star dominated to blue chippers. It’s a process no matter how badly we want it to be instant. Even with that we have been a to 10 team 2 of the last 3 years.
We’re getting there