volbeast33
You can count on Carlos!
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2009
- Messages
- 34,405
- Likes
- 105,695
None of that address my question about your hypocrisy
It’s simple.Where was I hypocritical, specifically? And can it be hypocrisy if the basis of the two ideas are fundamentally different?
In this instance, I'm talking about foreign policy, you're talking about intelligence. So....
It's like accusing someone of hypocrisy because they badmouthing tacos after you've served them burgers, your accusation makes no sense.
I didn’t call out any of the dipsh its on the left when they tried to blame Trump for stupidity 3 months in. Neither did you. I’m not calling out those on the right now doing it to Biden but a lot of previously silent people (yourself included) now think it’s silly to call out Biden. Why do you suppose that hypocrisy exists?
@clarksvol00 you’re welcome to explain the difference too.
I wasn't posting 3 months after Trump got elected but I'll admit I didn't like him so I wasn't going to get into long debate about somebody blaming him for something (although I may have offered up a lukewarm defense once or twice). So, yeah, my hypocrisy knows no bounds.
I am still legitimately curious if he made some kind of shift in middle eastern policy that people think led up to this or is it generally a "Biden is weak" sentiment.
It’s simple.
You call out people who are on Biden’s case after 3 months. You don’t call out people wrongly giving Biden credit after 3 months. You didn’t call out people who were on Trump 3 months in.
You’re hypocrisy is partisan.
@Septic
At least I know you also have a job.
Our little debates go a couple minutes in the morning then pauses till after 5.
The answer is to become totally oil independent and cut off the ME.
Such is the life of the small business man.Uncle Sam demands I write him (what I consider to be a large) check every four months and wish as I might, that money isn't going to magically appear in my checking account.
I'm very fortunate that my governor choose wisely when it came to keeping Florida open.
You passed on that chance. That’s why we’re talking about it now. It’s not to late though. You could try being consistent from now on.It is simple, I agree. I'm surprised that you're struggling with the conflation.
Now, if you can point out where someone was grousing about and blaming Donny's foreign policy agenda for the worlds woes three months into his term - I'll happily "call them out" retroactively.
I'll wait here while you suss them out.
You passed on that chance. That’s why we’re talking about it now. It’s not to late though. You could try being consistent from now on.
AwwwI'd have thought by now you'd have gotten past that confused stage just after sunset and recognized your conflation. Though, I suppose the strict dichotomy of to critize or not doesn't depend on content or context in your world. Black or white.
thisfun.gif
Awww
The modified “he mad” approach.
How cute
*sigh* Apparently this is your new fall back position when we engage. I didn't imply you were mad, not in the least - but now you've got me curious. Shoehorning it where it doesn't apply is beneath you.
While you contemplate on whether or not you want to double down on this "he thinks I'm mad" fetal position, have you given any more thought to whether content and context matter in critical thought and critisism of a presidents actions. Or is the with us or against us knuckle drag the hill you're really looking to die on?
Dude.
The continuation of the “he mad” is kinda sad.
You’re dragging this all over the place.
You were called out for inconsistent behavior.
You’ve twisted you’ve turned and even Cried a little.
If I didn’t strike a nerve of truth with you then you would have moved on but your rationalizations get longer and longer. The partisan hack is strong in you.