bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,137
- Likes
- 50,393
If we are saying Tennessee needs 2 wins...do you feel better of our chance of beating Vanderbilt and then Ole Miss...or Ole Miss and then Florida? That's my point.
Like who?
Where are you getting this from? I have never ever heard of any selection committee justification of picking bubble teams based on total wins. They look at WHO you beat. Vandy is irrelevant
VIRGINIA
RPI: 64
SOS: 112
OOC: 299
Conf. SOS: 73
Good Wins: #1 Duke, #21 North Carolina, #26 Wisconsin, #27 N.C. State
Bad Losses: #127 Deleware, #129 Georgia Tech, #156 George Mason, #165 Clemson, #168 Wake Forest, #315 Old Dominion, #131 Boston College
Last 10: 6-4
W/L 1-50: 4-2
W/L 51-100: 3-0
W/L 101-200: 7-6
W/L 200+: 6-1
TENNESSEE
RPI: 56
SOS: 36
OOC SOS: 36
Conf. SOS: 75
Good Wins: #6 Florida, #40 Wichita State
Bad Losses: #128 Georgia x 2
Last 10: 7-3
W/L 1-50: 2-3
W/L 51-100: 6-6
W/L 101-200: 3-2
W/L 201+: 6-0
I wouldn't say UVA is a lock to make the tournament.
But they have more quality wins than us. 2 wins vs. Top 25, 4 wins vs Top 50, they are 7-2 vs. the top 100 where as we don't even have a winning record against the same group. They also have a winning record vs the Top 150, where we are merely a .500 team.
They've lost to worse teams than us, but more importantly they've beaten more quality opponents than we have. That is why a win vs. Vanderbilt is meaningless. We need better wins on our resume. There's a reason Lunardi didn't move us down after losing to UGA
I disagree completely, but we'll see where we stand after Saturday. If everyone's saying just 1 win which I've heard a lot we'll know.
As for quality wins, UMASS wins tonight and now weve got 3 quality wins to UVAs 4...and a WHOLE lot less bad losses.
What do you disagree with? The records I stated are facts. And if UVA gets in and we don't it will be because of their record against better teams. Not because they reached an arbitrary goal of having 20 wins.
BTO, like you mentioned, if we get a 3 seed, we would play Mizzou. I would hate to play them back to back. It would also happen if we were a 4 seed resulting from a UK split, and Bama loss.
If we earn the 4 by way of a UK getting swept, and Bama beating UGA, our first opponent would be UK.
However, if you get your wish and we don't earn a double-bye. There is a reasonable chance we could play Ole Miss in our 2nd game. I would much prefer this to any of the previous scenarios. Beating a fellow bubble team would be a huge step into getting into the dance and it's almost impossible to beat a team like us 3 times in a season. I also think Ole Miss is worse than UK.
From this line of reasoning, I could definitely agree with you that we don't want a double-bye. I think the best case scenario might be to get the 6 or 7 seed and play either Ole Miss or Bama in our 2nd game.
What would it take for Tennessee to get a six seed?