Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#978
#978
VolinWayne said:
I'm sure they have proof but there are plenty cases out there. There's a guy in Michigan who has been entering random dead people into the system and finding they voted


Click to expand...

I tried it and verified that the 102 yr. old Mr. Bradley, who passed away in 1984, requested a ballot and it was mailed out on 9/19. It was mailed back in and received on 10/2. I bet he is pissed that he voted for Biden. This election cannot be upheld if even a fraction of the voter irregularities are found to have actually occurred.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, Orange_Vol1321 and ajvol01
#979
#979
LAVol1 said:
I tried it and verified that the 102 yr. old Mr. Bradley, who passed away in 1984, requested a ballot and it was mailed out on 9/19. It was mailed back in and received on 10/2. I bet he is pissed that he voted for Biden. This election cannot be upheld if even a fraction of the voter irregularities are found to have actually occurred.
Click to expand...

Dead people’s votes aren’t counted. Even if they were alive, cast an early ballot by mail, then died before Election Day their vote is tossed.

y’all act like there is no verification to processing votes.

This stuff is so easy to debunk it’s kinda sad Trumpers are clinging to it.

Fact check: False claim that 14K dead people voted in Michigan

Sorry to bust your conspiracy theory bubble.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: USMC-TNVOL and MontyPython
#987
#987
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Click to expand...

This isn't evidence of anything. Rudy Giuliani has spent the last five years overhyping supposedly scandalous and bombshell developments, which never materialize into anything of significance. Before Giuliani can be taken to task for overpromising big news while underdelivering proof, he has moved on to another big allegation. Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

At what point, do you start to question Rudy Giuliani's integrity? When do you stop trusting him? Or is the question of whether or not Rudy Giuliani's information is accurate, even important to you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and Septic
#993
#993
MarcoVol said:


Click to expand...


I’m sorry. I highly doubt there is any form of systemic voter fraud either. But the tweet and the “fact check” are another example of confirmation bias. Tweeter says it’s “nonsense” and then pastes a “fact check” that does cite multiple sources as to what is done to mitigate interference. However, none of it actually proves it didn’t happen. It’s essentially like saying there’s no way your computer got a virus because you had antiviral software.

Again, unlikely to have occurred, but there’s no proof of that in his tweet. He’s basically just telling people to take his word for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#995
#995
newyorkvol said:
I’m sorry. I highly doubt there is any form of systemic voter fraud either. But the tweet and the “fact check” are another example of confirmation bias. Tweeter says it’s “nonsense” and then pastes a “fact check” that does cite multiple sources as to what is done to mitigate interference. However, none of it actually proves it didn’t happen. It’s essentially like saying there’s no way your computer got a virus because you had antiviral software.

Again, unlikely to have occurred, but there’s no proof of that in his tweet. He’s basically just telling people to take his word for it.
Click to expand...

Not a rando on Twitter.

Christopher Krebs serves as the first director of the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
 
#996
#996
MarcoVol said:
Not a rando on Twitter.

Christopher Krebs serves as the first director of the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
Click to expand...

That’s fine. I get that. But what he posted as a fact check did not prove there was no interference. It only proves there are systems in place to prevent it.

Again, not trying to say it happened, just looking for truthful info. He’s claiming it didn’t happen because there are processes in place to prevent it. It’s an argument of probability but not proof, so he shouldn’t from his position, be claiming it as “nonsense.”
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top