I've always thought those who were against prayers at such events were just silly. I see no way for anyone to infer the government is establishing a religion by allowing prayers at such events. If I were Cheek I would tell them to pack sand.
Your father probably said the same thing when he didn't understand why these interlopers were saying he had to go to school with black kids and have them be able to drink out of the same water fountain.
This.Separation of church and state......I don't care if the University(State) owns the stadium or not, it is associated heavily if nothing else.
I could careless one way or the other but I feel everyone in the stadium shouldn't be subjected to the prayer just for tradition's sake....let the teams pray individually and anyone else who cares to talk to god anytime they like before kick-off or during the game.
they own certain things for marketing (logo, Vols, etc) but not the actual name of the university. They are using it to join the UTAD and the school
then you would be perfectly fine with a Muslim prayer before every game?
I would be if they hadn't been slaughtering our citizens in the name of that religion....a little sensitive
I think it would be interesting to see just how everything is done, from a legal side. Because the UT AD itself is separate from the University, it would be interesting to see how they have things set up.
Actually it's the exact same arguments..."this is our culture", "if you don't like it leave"..."these people aren't even from here", "majority wants it", etc that were used to fight desegregation in the 50's and 60's.
This.
Don't stop anyone from doing what they want to do, but don't subject every person in the stadium to it.
Actually it's the exact same arguments..."this is our culture", "if you don't like it leave"..."these people aren't even from here", "majority wants it", etc that were used to fight desegregation in the 50's and 60's.
So now if someone prays or holds a prayer session who also owns a banner of a public institution than it must be stopped? That's not reaching at all.
and you think that would happen without a push from somewhere?
I think the issue has been brought to the front, but if I remember back to the original article this group tried to issue a cease and desist. Had they merely urged the University to look into it then you probably wouldn't have gotten the reaction that has been shown on this site.....or maybe you would. :blink: