President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#226
#226

Trump Ally — Who Could Be AG — Warns NY’s Letitia James to Back Off president-elect: ‘We will put your Fat Ass in Prison’​


A fierce ally of President-elect Donald Trump warned Thursday that the new administration will have no patience for New York Attorney General Letitia James if she weaponizes the legal system against the 47th president.

“I dare you to try to continue your lawfare against President Trump in his second term,” Mike Davis, the founder of the Article III Project, an advocacy group that pushes for the nominations of conservative judges, said during an appearance on “The Benny Show” podcast.

“Listen here, sweetheart,” Davis continued, addressing James. “We’re not messing around this time and we will put your fat a– in prison for conspiracy against rights. I promise you that.”

Davis, who has been floated as a possible Trump pick for attorney general or White House counsel in his incoming administration, urged the New York AG to “think long and hard” before potentially violating the president-elect’s “constitutional rights or any other Americans’ constitutional rights.”

nypost.com

Trump ally — who could be AG — warns NY’s Letitia James to back off president-elect: ‘We will put your fat ass in prison’

“We’re not messing around this time and we will put your fata– in prison for conspiracy against rights. I promise you that,” Mike Davis said of New York AG James.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz, MR_VOL, TN-POSSUM and 4 others
#227
#227
CagleMtnVol said:
They never imagined in 1868 that the 14th amendment would be used to allow millions of people to stay in the country by coming here and giving birth.
Click to expand...
They never imagined their would be school shootings. So eliminate the 2A. We have mechanisms to change the constitution. Some of you are exactly like the left on the constitution. If you disagree you don't care how it's changed. Sad and gross
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonC, 85SugarVol, EasternVol and 2 others
#228
#228
volfanhill said:
They never imagined their would be school shootings. So eliminate the 2A. We have mechanisms to change the constitution. Some of you are exactly like the left on the constitution. If you disagree you don't care how it's changed. Sad and gross
Click to expand...
Not sure what school shootings have to do with eliminating the 2nd amendment? There is already laws against committing murder it doesn't matter if it's at a school or where ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MR_VOL, jmacvols1, sami and 1 other person
#229
#229

Federal Judge Strikes Down Harris-Biden admin Effort to Grant ‘Amnesty’ to Illegal Migrants Married To US Citizens​



A Texas federal judge on Thursday struck down the Harris-Biden administration’s plan to fast track permanent residency for illegal migrants married to American citizens.

US District Judge J. Campbell Barker’s ruling comes two months after he issued an order temporarily pausing the administration’s so-called “Parole in Place” program, which sought to grant work authorization, permanent residency and eventually citizenship to spouses and stepchildren of US citizens who have been in the country for at least 10 years.

“The Rule exceeds statutory authority and is not in accordance with law,” Barker wrote in his 74-page ruling, adding that the policy “focuses on the wrong thing in identifying ‘significant public benefits’ — the benefits of aliens’ new legal status, rather than their presence in this country.”

nypost.com

Federal judge strikes down Harris-Biden admin effort to grant ‘amnesty’ to illegal migrants married to US citizens

The judge, an appointee of President-elect Donald Trump, found that “history and purpose confirm that defendants’ view stretches legal interpretation past its breaking point.”
nypost.com nypost.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: MR_VOL and CagleMtnVol
#230
#230
CagleMtnVol said:
Not sure what school shootings have to do with eliminating the 2nd amendment? There is already laws against committing murder it doesn't matter if it's at a school or where ever.
Click to expand...
It's the excuse liberals use to ignore the 2A. Just like the excuse you are using to ignore the 14th. It's bull. Wrong. Shameful. I don't care what you feel or agree with. The constitution is what we should all respect. There is method to change it. Not you being FOS. Just like how the Dems are with the 2A. The 14th is clear. As is the 2A.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol
#231
#231
volfanhill said:
It's the excuse liberals use to ignore the 2A. Just like the excuse you are using to ignore the 14th. It's bull. Wrong. Shameful. I don't care what you feel or agree with. The constitution is what we should all respect. There is method to change it. Not you being FOS. Just like how the Dems are with the 2A. The 14th is clear. As is the 2A.
Click to expand...

Leave the kid here and send them back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737, Franklin Pierce and CagleMtnVol
#233
#233
volfanhill said:
It's the excuse liberals use to ignore the 2A. Just like the excuse you are using to ignore the 14th. It's bull. Wrong. Shameful. I don't care what you feel or agree with. The constitution is what we should all respect. There is method to change it. Not you being FOS. Just like how the Dems are with the 2A. The 14th is clear. As is the 2A.
Click to expand...
[1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.]

It doesn't say anything about the mother, daddy, sister, brother, grandma, cousin, aunt or uncle can stay just because the child is considered a citizen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: malinoisvol and sami
#234
#234
Wait a minute...

[are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.]

If they don't actually reside in the US or a state? It's all about interpretation
 
#237
#237
CagleMtnVol said:
[1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.]

It doesn't say anything about the mother, daddy, sister, brother, grandma, cousin, aunt or uncle can stay just because the child is considered a citizen.
Click to expand...
“and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.

That is the key phrase that could be challenged in court to deny citizenship to children born in the US to illegal alien parents. They are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof. They are here illegally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MR_VOL and CagleMtnVol
#238
#238
I read there are suspected 400k children of illegal immigrants born in the US every year....that is wrong and shouldn't be allowed...Trumps plan is to challenge it...get SCOTUS to rule. Then if needed will work towards a constitutional solution
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs and CagleMtnVol
#239
#239
whodeycin85 said:
I read there are suspected 400k children of illegal immigrants born in the US every year....that is wrong and shouldn't be allowed...Trumps plan is to challenge it...get SCOTUS to rule. Then if needed will work towards a constitutional solution
Click to expand...
It can be shot down in court. There will be no constitutional solution. The solution is already there.
 
#240
#240
lawgator1 said:
I agree that advertising for food is often very misleading. And yes, too much sugar and salt to make it taste good and have you buy it again.

But RFK touts a lot of off base, unaccepted stuff, and when confronted retreats to classic conspiracy rhetoric about unseen unknown forces keeping the rest of us from knowing the truth he claims to understand, in his deeply, deeply, uneducated pseudo science way
Click to expand...
Sugar and salt? This is about chemicals that are banned around the globe but somehow allowed in the USA. The US version of froot loops couldn't be sold anywhere else in the world and we wonder why our kids are sick?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlipKidVol, MR_VOL and FLVOL_79
#242
#242
utvolpj said:
Sugar and salt? This is about chemicals that are banned around the globe but somehow allowed in the USA. The US version of froot loops couldn't be sold anywhere else in the world and we wonder why our kids are sick?
Click to expand...
Code Red Mountain Dew can be sold on the black market in Europe..I watched people in a Nordic country drop $50 for a 12 pack once about 15 years ago..
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#243
#243
Franklin Pierce said:

Federal Judge Strikes Down Harris-Biden admin Effort to Grant ‘Amnesty’ to Illegal Migrants Married To US Citizens​



A Texas federal judge on Thursday struck down the Harris-Biden administration’s plan to fast track permanent residency for illegal migrants married to American citizens.

US District Judge J. Campbell Barker’s ruling comes two months after he issued an order temporarily pausing the administration’s so-called “Parole in Place” program, which sought to grant work authorization, permanent residency and eventually citizenship to spouses and stepchildren of US citizens who have been in the country for at least 10 years.

“The Rule exceeds statutory authority and is not in accordance with law,” Barker wrote in his 74-page ruling, adding that the policy “focuses on the wrong thing in identifying ‘significant public benefits’ — the benefits of aliens’ new legal status, rather than their presence in this country.”

nypost.com

Federal judge strikes down Harris-Biden admin effort to grant ‘amnesty’ to illegal migrants married to US citizens

The judge, an appointee of President-elect Donald Trump, found that “history and purpose confirm that defendants’ view stretches legal interpretation past its breaking point.”
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...

Get them all out of this country. All
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs, MR_VOL, TN-POSSUM and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top