NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,722
- Likes
- 82,401
Absolutely there is. Your perspective is off. That land is yours and mine. If you view yourself as a public land owner it’s extremely empowering. I take off every year to hunt WY. I camp there and roam wherever I please on the public land (mostly NFS, State, and BLM land). It’s a fantastic exercise that more people should take advantage of.
Ownership/title should be with the state the land is in and if the Feds want to have a say they need to execute a lease or usage rights. But the Feds should have zero ownership of any land in the US outside of DC.
There were multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russian offers of assistance to the Campaign, and in some instances, the Campaign was receptive to the offers.
Going by Trump’s own words in his tweet - he’s the leader - of the country. He’s not President of all states and cities, not just republican ones
If that’s the problem as you define it then wouldn’t voting for a man who has made his family and himself rich off of being a career politician be contributing to that problem?Putting your personal benefits above all else pretty much sums up the problem with this country. It’s the pervasive “**** you I got mine” attitude.
Oh bull ****. That’s a shade weak ass indictment that doesn’t allow Trump to respond.
“well we think we saw evidence of collusion but we can’t prove anything”
“So you have no proof of collusion”
“Well we saw indications of...”
“What proof do you have that collusion occurred. Where are your recommendations for indictments on collusion?”
“We didn’t make any”
“Next witness your honor”
Yes. That is an accurate paraphrase.
No it isn’t. If it isn’t titled to an individual or Corp it’s the state’s property. No reason for the Feds to own public lands. I hunt and fish on public lands and lakes all over Texas too. STATE lands. And the parks are generally better maintained.Absolutely there is. Your perspective is off. That land is yours and mine. If you view yourself as a public land owner it’s extremely empowering. I take off every year to hunt WY. I camp there and roam wherever I please on the public land (mostly NFS, State, and BLM land). It’s a fantastic exercise that more people should take advantage of.
Signed off on crappy budgets, his COVID bailout agreement, his refusal to be fiscally responsible. His non eviction cdc order
The defense has rested but go ahead and read that last sentence out loud “counselor” and I’ll wait for the list of indictments.
Trump didn’t have to respond. His attorney general had already lied about the conclusions and most of his people still erroneously believe that rendition of the facts. Case in point: you.
Of course that still didn’t stop him from actually responding. Which he did. Many times. All dishonestly.
No it isn’t. If it isn’t titled to an individual or Corp it’s the state’s property. No reason for the Feds to own public lands. I hunt and fish on public lands and lakes all over Texas too. STATE lands. And the parks are generally better maintained.
Create some issue? What damn right do the Feds have to the land FFS! I’m not advocating that we remove or repurpose a single acre. I’m stating the obvious that the states should take their damn sovereign property back.That’s not my experience around this country. You want to create an issue where there isn’t one based on some weird state-over-federal philosophy. I hunt and fish state lands too in PA, WV, NC, TN, WY, and OH. State lands are fine. So are federal lands. The large swaths of BLM lands out west are exactly what they’re supposed to be. Relatively undisturbed and available to the public.