DC_Vol
Bush league poster
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 21,907
- Likes
- 40,508
Here is the problem. There should be no debate about the planes. They hit the towers and the pentagon. I am willing to concede everything else is up for "debate." Once you start questioning the planes, which many truthers do, then there is no reason to discuss with that person because they live in LaLa land.
Right. Every single eye witness account lines up with the official report. I see the word "most" being used. So that means not all. Which by extension means that there are disagreements amongst people.
Spin the grand conspiracy crap like other idiots before you have if you like. It doesnt change anything. Like I said, question anything and you're a conspiracy nut. Oh yeah your friend legitimizes everything. Its sad that you and some others cannot even entertain the possibility that the official reports that were given could be wrong. Closed minded and idiotic.
There are many professional pilots and engineers that refute that argument.
Do some research with an open mind. Professionals that know so much more than you and i, have put there reputations on the line to claim as much.
This is just one...
Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers | EU
Link is so ridiculous that my computer turned off when I clicked on itThere are many professional pilots and engineers that refute that argument.
Do some research with an open mind. Professionals that know so much more than you and i, have put there reputations on the line to claim as much.
This is just one...
Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers | EU
Let's pretend you're Spock and driven by logic..... Which is more logical? Is it the mega super secret controlled demolition of three skyscrapers or what can be explained with pictures, videos and eyewitness accounts?
Mobile Site Preview
Link is so ridiculous that my computer turned off when I clicked on it
Wtf....9/11 wasn't some damn David Copperfield's World of Magic event
There are many professional pilots and engineers that refute that argument.
Do some research with an open mind. Professionals that know so much more than you and i, have put there reputations on the line to claim as much.
This is just one...
Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers | EU
Architects and Engineers On 9/11! Excellent Must See! - YouTube
This is an honest question. Why is everyone in this video (structural engineers, physicists, mettalurgists, chemical engineers, architects) just wrong? Why are their opinions less valid than what the NIST report says?
Why are the eyewitnesses who said they heard explosions wrong? Firefighters, medics, regular people and police officers all said they heard explosions. Why is that? Why is it that people were at ground zero and said it reminded them of demolition? Why did some experts in the field of controlled demolition say it was CD? I know other CD experts have said it wasnt, but why would their opinion be more valid? Why didnt NIST test for explosives? Why didnt NIST do a full and proper investigation?
There is conflicting information out there that begs the question of what really happened. We dont know what really happened. And thats sad. Remember: "it is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority."- Benjamin Franklin
Like a damn fool, I clicked on it. The absolute idiocy spewing from that information (term used very loosely) and from the links provided within is at the level of comedy. It's the kind of stuff Wiley Coyote would come up with to fool the Road Runner.
The same people on here saying that there is no possible way our govt could have covered this up without somebody talking/leaking are the very same ones that dismiss any information from people that would be the so-called talkers/leakers. We've had people on the inside that would have intimate information about the details of this get shouted down.
Why can't the 9/11 cynics at least admit that some of the people that they claim should have blown the whistle on this perhaps are doing it in the truther movement?
Irony approves of this post.It's useless trying to debate with people who don't have the capacity or willingness to see anything different. The official government story of 9/11 is outrageously full of holes, and most logical people, if interested, will delve into the subject and can see for themselves.
Instead, this contingent relies on blind faith that our government could never be compliant in anything that would harm US citizens in order to springboard their warmongering agenda.
It's the same people who defend our government for supporting the likes of ISIS and terrorist countries like Saudi Arabia and Turkey. The same ones that unthinkingly absorb the Russophobia and islamophobia like sponges. The same ones that make Wile E. Coyote jokes because they have nothing else. It's useless...